Alienware X51 R2

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics24.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (54%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemAlienware X51 R2  (all builds)
MotherboardAlienware 0PGRP5
Memory4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20141117
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 23 '21 at 08:02
Run Duration249 Seconds
Run User BRN-User
Background CPU 54%

 PC Performing below expectations (28th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4790-$135
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
66.8% Good
Memory 89.6
1-Core 66.3
2-Core 149
62% 102 Pts
4-Core 240
8-Core 376
38% 308 Pts
64-Core 456
28% 456 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 66.8%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 760 Ti OEM
Nvidia(10DE 1074) 2GB
CLim: 1202 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 472.12
Performing below potential (24th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
24.6% Poor
Lighting 27.1
Reflection 10.3
Parallax 38.7
22% 25.4 fps
MRender 42.2
Gravity 34.2
Splatting 32.8
29% 36.4 fps
Poor: 25%
This bench: 24.6%
Great: 28%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$32
233GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 45 47 65 60 57 54 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
22.9% Poor
Read 24.9
Write 70.2
Mixed 33.6
SusWrite 54.8
34% 45.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.2
36% 0.27 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 22.9%
Great: 109%
Generic Flash Disk 16GB
2GB free, PID 6387
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 10 7.2 7.5 6.2 6.7 7 MB/s
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
4.64% Terrible
Read 14.7
Write 6
Mixed 14
SusWrite 7.4
14% 10.5 MB/s
4K Read 3.8
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
14% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 2%
This bench: 4.64%
Great: 8%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B5173QH0-CK0 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
49% Average
MC Read 18.4
MC Write 17.2
MC Mixed 15.8
49% 17.1 GB/s
SC Read 9
SC Write 15.4
SC Mixed 13
36% 12.5 GB/s
Latency 67.8
59% 67.8 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 49%
Great: 59%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 39: 4R 6G 1B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
39% 44% 25 311 233 60 31.5" 1920 1080 ACR0000 ED320QR
History: Score 44: 5R 4G 7B | Score 39: 4R 6G 1B
Typical X51 R2 Builds (Compare 1,596 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 43%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

System: Alienware X51 R2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 88% - Excellent Total price: $325
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback