PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (24th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 76 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
Graphics | 27.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 8.03% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD. |
Memory | 32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
System | Dell Precision Tower 7910 |
Motherboard | Dell Precision Tower 7910 (all builds) |
Memory | 2.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20190605 |
Uptime | 0.1 Days |
Run Date | Sep 23 '21 at 05:04 |
Run Duration | 172 Seconds |
Run User | MYS-User |
Background CPU | 10% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2680 v3
SOCKET 1, 2 CPU, 24 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg)
|
62.2%
Good
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia Quadro K5200
Nvidia(10DE 1095) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 875 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 7.5GB, Driver: 452.06
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
27.8%
Poor
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
SK hynix SH920 2.5 7MM 512GB
92GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CL00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 118 148 67 94 62 75 MB/s
|
8.03%
Terrible
|
|||
Toshiba DT01ACA200 2TB-$40
246GB free
Firmware: ABX0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 117 117 117 115 116 118 MB/s
|
66.5%
Good
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung M393A1G43DB0-CPB 4x8GB
4 of 16 slots used
32GB RIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
|
100%
Outstanding
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2680 v41stBench 66%, 1,252 samples | 61x |
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2690 v41stBench 72%, 529 samples | 57x |
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2630 v31stBench 64%, 1,710 samples | 48x |
GPU | |
---|---|
Quadro M4000NvidiaBench 32%, 9,043 samples | 102x |
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples | 71x |
RTX 3060-TiNvidia $340Bench 128%, 442,467 samples | 70x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER |