Asus ASUS TUF Gaming F15 FX506HE_FX506HE

Performance Results


Gaming 55% Yacht	Desktop 87% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 49% Yacht


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	66.3% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	293% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago.

System	Asus ASUS TUF Gaming F15 FX506HE_FX506HE (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK FX506HE
Memory	10.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	Цвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20210506
Uptime	0.4 Days
Run Date	Sep 23 '21 at 04:48
Run Duration	205 Seconds
Run User	RUS-User
Background CPU	0%

PC Performing as expected (56^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-11400H 35,470 User benchmarks, average bench 80% U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	72.9% Very good	Memory 69 1-Core 129 2-Core 253 81% 150 Pts	4-Core 413 8-Core 591 63% 502 Pts	64-Core 734 46% 734 Pts
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 72.9% Great: 87%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3050-Ti (Laptop) 35,839 User benchmarks, average bench 61% Asus(1043 13EC) ≥ 4GB Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 30.0.14.7212 Performing below potential (68^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	66.3% Good	Lighting 91.2 Reflection 73.3 Parallax 80.9 74% 81.8 fps	MRender 67.3 Gravity 63 Splatting 57.7 51% 62.7 fps
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 66.3% Great: 72%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Nvme Samsung SSD 970 EVO PLUS 500GB 1,705 User benchmarks, average bench 280% 325GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1833 1048 816 818 822 823 MB/s Performing as expected (56^th percentile)	293% Outstanding	Read 2,504 Write 2,097 Mixed 1,814 SusWrite 1,027 416% 1,860 MB/s	4K Read 65.8 4K Write 169 4K Mixed 89.4 304% 108 MB/s	DQ Read 908 DQ Write 699 DQ Mixed 763 582% 790 MB/s
Poor: 161% ↑ This bench: 293% Great: 365%
Nvme SAMSUNG MZVLQ512HBLU-00B00 512GB 7,990 User benchmarks, average bench 183% 295GB free Firmware: FXM7201Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1618 1587 1044 364 340 247 MB/s Performing above expectations (78^th percentile)	214% Outstanding	Read 1,578 Write 1,570 Mixed 1,467 SusWrite 867 308% 1,370 MB/s	4K Read 43.3 4K Write 111 4K Mixed 57.5 198% 70.6 MB/s	DQ Read 918 DQ Write 744 DQ Mixed 842 627% 835 MB/s
Poor: 111% ↑ This bench: 214% Great: 253%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial BL8G32C16S4B.8FE 2x8GB 320 User benchmarks, average bench 79% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz Performing above expectations (68^th percentile)	82.5% Excellent	MC Read 34 MC Write 32.1 MC Mixed 27.4 89% 31.2 GB/s	SC Read 14.3 SC Write 29.6 SC Mixed 15.2 56% 19.7 GB/s	Latency 104 39% 104 ns
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 82.5% Great: 96%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	9	7	144	15.5"	1280 720	CMN1521

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical ASUS TUF Gaming F15 FX506HE_FX506HE Builds (Compare 1,437 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 11%

Tree trunk

Desktop 76%

Battleship

Workstation 11%

Tree trunk

System: Asus ASUS TUF Gaming F15 FX506HE_FX506HE

CPU
Core i5-11400HIntelBench 80%, 35,470 samples	990x
Core i7-11800HIntelBench 88%, 56,029 samples	447x

GPU
UHD GraphicsIntelBench 4%, 25,082 samples	604x
RTX 3050-Ti (Laptop)NvidiaBench 61%, 35,839 samples	572x
UHD GraphicsIntelBench 7%, 53,008 samples	261x

SSD
INTEL SSDPEKNU512GZ 512GBNvmeBench 197%, 18,245 samples	466x
SAMSUNG MZVLQ512HBLU-00B00 512GBNvmeBench 183%, 7,990 samples	319x
HFM512GD3JX013N 512GBNvmeBench 257%, 7,746 samples	109x

RAM
M471A1G44AB0-CWE 2x8GBSamsungBench 68%, 57,752 samples	438x
M471A1G44AB0-CWE 1x8GBSamsungBench 39%, 19,438 samples	157x
8ATF1G64HZ-3G2R1 2x8GBMicronBench 83%, 15,291 samples	127x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16