HP Z210 Workstation

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (73rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 27 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics2.01% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive43.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (30%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP Z210 Workstation  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 1588h
Memory1.9 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120110
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 14 '17 at 09:24
Run Duration124 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU 30%

 PC Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2500
XU1 PROCESSOR, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
70.1% Very good
Memory 83.6
1-Core 87.2
2-Core 167
66% 112 Pts
4-Core 327
8-Core 338
44% 332 Pts
64-Core 345
21% 345 Pts
Poor: 47%
This bench: 70.1%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 610
Gigabyte(1458 3546) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 309.8
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
2.01% Terrible
Lighting 2.43
Reflection 2.96
Parallax 1.91
2% 2.43 fps
MRender 3.05
Gravity 2.53
Splatting 2.13
2% 2.57 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.01%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Inte SSDSA2BW160G3H 160GB
86GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 4PC10365 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
43.8% Average
Read 257
Write 164
Mixed 184
45% 202 MB/s
4K Read 17.5
4K Write 31
4K Mixed 15.6
63% 21.3 MB/s
DQ Read 145
DQ Write 56.8
DQ Mixed 32.4
42% 78 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 43.8%
Great: 46%
Seagate ST3160318AS 160GB-$43
148GB free
Firmware: HP40 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
52.4% Above average
Read 91.3
Write 91.2
Mixed 83.4
67% 88.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.68
4K Write 1.71
4K Mixed 0.6
126% 1 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 52.4%
Great: 58%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B5773CH0-CH9 2x2GB
2 of 4 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
46.5% Average
MC Read 16.5
MC Write 17.1
MC Mixed 14.9
46% 16.2 GB/s
SC Read 12.1
SC Write 13.4
SC Mixed 12.6
36% 12.7 GB/s
Latency 74.2
54% 74.2 ns
Poor: 24%
This bench: 46.5%
Great: 50%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z210 Workstation Builds (Compare 1,006 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: HP Z210 Workstation

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $159
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback