HP 34-a010

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (78th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 22 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics5.16% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive90.5% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemHP 34-a010  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 2B4C
Memory5.4 GB free of 12 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150917
Uptime19.2 Days
Run DateSep 22 '21 at 22:53
Run Duration137 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing above expectations (78th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-6400T
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.55 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
67.4% Good
Memory 79.3
1-Core 86.4
2-Core 168
65% 111 Pts
4-Core 322
8-Core 322
43% 322 Pts
64-Core 308
19% 308 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 67.4%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 530 (Desktop Skylake)
HP(103C 2B4C) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8681
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
5.16% Terrible
Lighting 5.3
Reflection 18.4
Parallax 6.4
4% 10 fps
MRender 7.5
Gravity 5.4
Splatting 10.9
7% 7.93 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.16%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
PNY CS900 500GB SSD
382GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CS900KA3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 355 342 397 356 387 385 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
90.5% Outstanding
Read 337
Write 396
Mixed 314
SusWrite 370
80% 354 MB/s
4K Read 31.3
4K Write 85.7
4K Mixed 36.5
140% 51.2 MB/s
DQ Read 218
DQ Write 309
DQ Mixed 166
153% 231 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 90.5%
Great: 96%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1G43DB0-CPB M471A5143DB0-CPB 12GB
2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 4096 MB
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
55.1% Above average
MC Read 20.2
MC Write 20.4
MC Mixed 17.3
55% 19.3 GB/s
SC Read 12.6
SC Write 20.7
SC Mixed 16.5
47% 16.6 GB/s
Latency 81.8
49% 81.8 ns
Poor: 40%
This bench: 55.1%
Great: 70%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 8 6 60 34" 1280 720 HWP3204 HP ENVY Curve
Typical 34-a010 Builds (Compare 8 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

System: HP 34-a010

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 81% - Excellent Total price: $89
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes the youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback