Alienware Aurora Ryzen Edition

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 101%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Boot Drive430% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemAlienware Aurora Ryzen Edition  (all builds)
MotherboardAlienware 0TYR0X
Memory54.8 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210809
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateSep 22 '21 at 16:21
Run Duration235 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (70th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 5950X-$360
AM4, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 4.4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
101% Outstanding
Memory 82.1
1-Core 164
2-Core 327
102% 191 Pts
4-Core 639
8-Core 1,264
112% 952 Pts
64-Core 2,749
170% 2,749 Pts
Poor: 90%
This bench: 101%
Great: 110%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3090-$1,135
Dell(1028 3880) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 4875 MHz, Ram: 24GB, Driver: 472.12
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Lighting 319
Reflection 304
Parallax 353
260% 325 fps
Gravity 262
Splatting 193
196% 227 fps
Poor: 185% Great: 230%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Pm9a1 NVMe Samsung 2048GB
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 36304129 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2618 2626 2631 2644 2654 2655 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
430% Outstanding
Read 2,624
Write 2,608
Mixed 2433
SusWrite 2638
581% 2,576 MB/s
4K Read 77.8
4K Write 184
4K Mixed 108
354% 123 MB/s
DQ Read 1,286
DQ Write 1121
DQ Mixed 1,203
902% 1,203 MB/s
Poor: 188%
This bench: 430%
Great: 471%
Amd-raid ST2000DM008-2FR1 2TB
2TB free
Firmware: 1003
SusWrite @10s intervals: 197 204 206 206 207 206 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
113% Outstanding
Read 185
Write 171
Mixed 43.9
SusWrite 204
109% 151 MB/s
4K Read 18.1
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 1.1
900% 6.83 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 113%
Great: 124%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 4TB
2TB free, PID 0900
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 105 100 103 102 102 103 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
44.1% Average
Read 135
Write 135
Mixed 20
SusWrite 102
126% 98.1 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.5
43% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 44.1%
Great: 53%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown XK2M26-MIE-NX 4x16GB
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
126% Outstanding
MC Read 76.5
MC Write 34.2
MC Mixed 35.3
139% 48.7 GB/s
SC Read 27
SC Write 20
SC Mixed 33.5
77% 26.8 GB/s
Latency 76.7
52% 76.7 ns
Poor: 72%
This bench: 126%
Great: 157%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 56: 10R 2G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
56% 29% 42 288 260 60 27.9" 2194 1234 PHLC231 PHL 288E2
Typical Aurora Ryzen Edition Builds (Compare 887 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 173%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 100%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 157%
UFO

System: Alienware Aurora Ryzen Edition

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 88% - Excellent Total price: $670
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback