Asus PRIME H310M-E

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus PRIME H310M-E  (all builds)
Memory8.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190118
Uptime5.1 Days
Run DateSep 22 '21 at 13:38
Run Duration146 Seconds
Run User ISR-User
Background CPU 13%

 PC Performing below expectations (39th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-8400-$114
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
86.8% Excellent
Memory 86.5
1-Core 123
2-Core 245
84% 151 Pts
4-Core 469
8-Core 696
72% 582 Pts
64-Core 664
41% 664 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 86.8%
Great: 89%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 120GB-$26
15GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFK61K1
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 328
Write 296
Mixed 300
69% 308 MB/s
4K Read 28.7
4K Write 63.9
4K Mixed 25.2
110% 39.3 MB/s
DQ Read 236
DQ Write 224
DQ Mixed 49.2
87% 170 MB/s
Poor: 33% Great: 85%
PH6-CE240 240GB
223GB free
Firmware: F/W:1.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 223 233 115 90 90 88 MB/s
Performing below potential (17th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
63.1% Good
Read 245
Write 236
Mixed 208
SusWrite 140
46% 207 MB/s
4K Read 31.7
4K Write 60.7
4K Mixed 32.5
122% 41.6 MB/s
DQ Read 160
DQ Write 173
DQ Mixed 145
115% 159 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 63.1%
Great: 100%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 999GB
37GB free
Firmware: 0.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 59 55 59 58 61 60 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
32.6% Below average
Read 55.2
Write 40.3
Mixed 25.7
SusWrite 58.6
33% 44.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.2
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.2
40% 0.3 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 32.6%
Great: 110%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905702-071.A00G 9905702-119.A00G 16GB
2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
69.6% Good
MC Read 28.3
MC Write 24.2
MC Mixed 21.6
71% 24.7 GB/s
SC Read 15.9
SC Write 23.2
SC Mixed 22
58% 20.4 GB/s
Latency 70.8
56% 70.8 ns
Poor: 60%
This bench: 69.6%
Great: 79%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PRIME H310M-E Builds (Compare 741 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 27%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus PRIME H310M-E

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 89% - Excellent Total price: $197
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback