DFI AVP40-B

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (84th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 16 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics34.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardDFI AVP40-B  (all builds)
Memory13.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180419
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 21 '21 at 05:09
Run Duration235 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing above expectations (84th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3610QE
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
74% Very good
Memory 86.6
1-Core 86.5
2-Core 174
68% 116 Pts
4-Core 340
8-Core 434
50% 387 Pts
64-Core 433
27% 433 Pts
Poor: 50%
This bench: 74%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon E9550
AMD(1002 0B31) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1243 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 21.20.16
Performing below potential (71st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
34.4% Below average
Lighting 40.3
Reflection 55
Parallax 63.4
33% 52.9 fps
MRender 48
Gravity 48.5
Splatting 42
37% 46.2 fps
Poor: 26%
This bench: 34.4%
Great: 39%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SSD7CS2111-120-IGT-1 120GB
1GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CS211104
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 464
Write 330
Mixed 298
81% 364 MB/s
4K Read 24.3
4K Write 44.7
4K Mixed 29
98% 32.7 MB/s
DQ Read 281
DQ Write 319
DQ Mixed 198
177% 266 MB/s
Poor: 73% Great: 104%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 78.C2GCZ.4030C 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
56.5% Above average
MC Read 21.5
MC Write 20.2
MC Mixed 17.7
57% 19.8 GB/s
SC Read 15.6
SC Write 15.8
SC Mixed 16.6
46% 16 GB/s
Latency 70.8
56% 70.8 ns
Poor: 43%
This bench: 56.5%
Great: 58%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 56: 7R 7G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
56% 14% 101 340 276 60 15.5" 1280 720 ELO1502
History: Score 26: 2R 3G 7B | Score 43: 5R 6G 0B | Score 56: 7R 7G 0B
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing charade so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit a lot from flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they've no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to market inferior products. UserBenchmark's data challenges the marketing and exposes the youtubers' biases.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. The 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data which saves our users millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback