Microelectronics G509

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 110%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 106%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 99%
Nuclear submarine
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (81st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 19 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 105%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics101% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive234% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemMicroelectronics G509  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK PRIME B550M-A AC
Memory59.8 GB free of 64 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210201
Uptime2.1 Days
Run DateSep 20 '21 at 21:42
Run Duration160 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (81st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 5600X-$120
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
105% Outstanding
Memory 92.2
1-Core 160
2-Core 319
103% 190 Pts
4-Core 634
8-Core 902
96% 768 Pts
64-Core 1,117
69% 1,117 Pts
Poor: 83%
This bench: 105%
Great: 107%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-$266
CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 3750 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 471.96
Performing below potential (62nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
101% Outstanding
Lighting 131
Reflection 120
Parallax 125
107% 126 fps
MRender 143
Gravity 104
Splatting 89.7
89% 112 fps
Poor: 90%
This bench: 101%
Great: 106%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue SN550 NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$99
316GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 211210WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 883 424 426 424 425 426 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
234% Outstanding
Read 1,587
Write 1,683
Mixed 1,325
SusWrite 501
286% 1,274 MB/s
4K Read 54.4
4K Write 199
4K Mixed 81.3
292% 112 MB/s
DQ Read 1,254
DQ Write 975
DQ Mixed 979
769% 1,069 MB/s
Poor: 152%
This bench: 234%
Great: 237%
Samsung 870 QVO 2TB-$165
1TB free
Firmware: SVQ01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 486 487 486 483 482 483 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
130% Outstanding
Read 516
Write 488
Mixed 437
SusWrite 484
108% 482 MB/s
4K Read 40.5
4K Write 123
4K Mixed 58.7
202% 74 MB/s
DQ Read 387
DQ Write 360
DQ Mixed 368
278% 372 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 130%
Great: 128%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMW32GX4M2Z3600C18 4x16GB
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
106% Outstanding
MC Read 45.1
MC Write 27.1
MC Mixed 40.8
108% 37.7 GB/s
SC Read 32.9
SC Write 26.8
SC Mixed 41.9
97% 33.9 GB/s
Latency 63.6
63% 63.6 ns
Poor: 74%
This bench: 106%
Great: 128%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 54: 10R 1G 1B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
54% 44% 27 340 278 165 31.5" 1920 1080 MSI3DA6 MSI G32C4
Typical G509 Builds (Compare 223 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 98%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 100%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 90%
Aircraft carrier

System: Microelectronics G509

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 88% - Excellent Total price: $485
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes the youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback