Toshiba SATELLITE PRO C50-A-1MX

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 51.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics2.89% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive70.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemToshiba SATELLITE PRO C50-A-1MX  (all builds)
MotherboardIntel PT10F
Memory2.7 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20131122
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateSep 20 '21 at 17:42
Run Duration155 Seconds
Run User UKR-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing as expected (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-3110M-$70
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
51.2% Above average
Memory 73.8
1-Core 60.8
2-Core 118
52% 84.2 Pts
4-Core 168
8-Core 165
22% 167 Pts
64-Core 169
10% 169 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 51.2%
Great: 58%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)
Toshiba(1179 FA31) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4252
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
2.89% Terrible
Lighting 3.5
Reflection 1.7
Parallax 2.5
3% 2.57 fps
MRender 4.3
Gravity 2.1
Splatting 4.3
3% 3.57 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.89%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SSD0240S00 240GB
192GB free (System drive)
Firmware: T0707B0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 355 375 386 372 362 366 MB/s
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
70.7% Very good
Read 444
Write 356
Mixed 337
SusWrite 369
85% 377 MB/s
4K Read 17.1
4K Write 46
4K Mixed 18
73% 27 MB/s
DQ Read 120
DQ Write 246
DQ Mixed 32.6
68% 133 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 70.7%
Great: 85%
TOSHIBA TransMemory 8GB
6GB free, PID 6544
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1.7 2.2 3.7 3.5 3.6 3.6 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
5.29% Terrible
Read 25.3
Write 3.8
Mixed 8.5
SusWrite 3
10% 10.1 MB/s
4K Read 4.1
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
15% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 5.29%
Great: 8%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown HMT325S6CFR8C-PB HMT325S6EFR8A-PB 4GB
1600, 1600 MHz
2048, 2048 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
53.2% Above average
MC Read 19
MC Write 20.6
MC Mixed 18.2
55% 19.3 GB/s
SC Read 14.3
SC Write 13.2
SC Mixed 13.9
39% 13.8 GB/s
Latency 92.9
43% 92.9 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 9 7 60 15.5" 1280 720 AUO22EC
Typical SATELLITE PRO C50-A-1MX Builds (Compare 9 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Toshiba SATELLITE PRO C50-A-1MX

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 51% - Above average Total price: $105
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes the youtubers that are paid to promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback