Asrock X299 Taichi XE

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 45%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics43.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive334% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock X299 Taichi XE  (all builds)
Memory24.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191128
Uptime3.3 Days
Run DateSep 20 '21 at 15:44
Run Duration202 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-7900X-$393
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
83.8% Excellent
Memory 68.3
1-Core 132
2-Core 264
83% 155 Pts
4-Core 531
8-Core 970
90% 751 Pts
64-Core 1,758
109% 1,758 Pts
Poor: 72%
This bench: 83.8%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130
AMD(1002 0B37) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1340 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 20.10.35.02
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
43.5% Average
Lighting 54.8
Reflection 53
Parallax 80.9
45% 62.9 fps
MRender 55.5
Gravity 56.6
Splatting 42.3
41% 51.5 fps
Poor: 46%
This bench: 43.5%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$170
190GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B2QEXP7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1831 1793 1923 1871 1585 1186 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
334% Outstanding
Read 2528
Write 2,125
Mixed 790
SusWrite 1,698
398% 1,785 MB/s
4K Read 45.2
4K Write 190
4K Mixed 73.4
263% 103 MB/s
DQ Read 1,257
DQ Write 888
DQ Mixed 1,068
799% 1,071 MB/s
Poor: 195%
This bench: 334%
Great: 393%
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$45
34GB free
Firmware: 3B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,971
Write 1,370
Mixed 732
299% 1,358 MB/s
4K Read 51.9
4K Write 152
4K Mixed 46.9
219% 83.6 MB/s
DQ Read 1,055
DQ Write 945
DQ Mixed 663
590% 888 MB/s
Poor: 142% Great: 236%
WD Red 3TB (2012)-$109
53GB free
Firmware: 82.00A82
SusWrite @10s intervals: 102 102 104 105 106 104 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
66.9% Good
Read 129
Write 114
Mixed 77.2
SusWrite 104
78% 106 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.9
172% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 66.9%
Great: 88%
WD Red 3TB (2012)-$109
56GB free
Firmware: 82.00A82
SusWrite @10s intervals: 139 136 139 142 141 139 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
80.3% Excellent
Read 140
Write 128
Mixed 90.4
SusWrite 139
92% 124 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1
188% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 80.3%
Great: 88%
USB Flash Disk 1GB
1GB free, PID 6025
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1.4 1.6 1.6 1.6 1.6 1.6 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
1.61% Terrible
Read 7.7
Write 1.2
Mixed 2.5
SusWrite 1.5
3% 3.22 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
3% 0.23 MB/s
Poor: 2%
This bench: 1.61%
Great: 4%
SDXC Card 128GB
94GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 55 59 57 58 58 58 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
36.1% Below average
Read 88.2
Write 53.9
Mixed 63.4
SusWrite 57.5
85% 65.8 MB/s
4K Read 7.8
4K Write 2.9
4K Mixed 4.2
270% 4.97 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 36.1%
Great: 45%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4x8GB
4 of 8 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
58.2% Above average
MC Read 18.5
MC Write 28.9
MC Mixed 17.9
62% 21.8 GB/s
SC Read 8.3
SC Write 21.5
SC Mixed 10.2
38% 13.3 GB/s
Latency 105
38% 105 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 58.2%
Great: 115%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 11 8 60 27" 1280 720 ACI27B3 ROG PG27AQ
Typical X299 Taichi XE Builds (Compare 108 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 168%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 181%
UFO

Motherboard: Asrock X299 Taichi XE

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 51% - Above average Total price: $1,698
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback