Maxsun MS-H55 Pro

Performance Results


Gaming 9% Tree trunk	Desktop 63% Destroyer	Workstation 7% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	8.96% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	22.9% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

High background CPU (29%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago.

Motherboard	Maxsun MS-H55 Pro (all builds)
Memory	5.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 0 GHz
Display	1360 x 768 - 32 Bit colors, 1360 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20100521
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Sep 20 '21 at 09:51
Run Duration	149 Seconds
Run User	MNG-User
Background CPU	29%

PC Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7 S 860 85 User benchmarks, average bench 65% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.55 GHz Performing above expectations (76^th percentile)	66.6% Good	Memory 93.5 1-Core 63.8 2-Core 122 59% 93 Pts	4-Core 217 8-Core 320 34% 268 Pts	64-Core 319 20% 319 Pts
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 66.6% Great: 71%

Graphics Cards	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10
Nvidia GeForce 310 4,147 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Device(1B0A 9060) 512MB Ram: 512MB, Driver: 342.01 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	0.95% Terrible	Lighting 1.1 Reflection 3 Parallax 0.4 1% 1.5 fps	MRender 2 Gravity 0.9 Splatting 1.1 1% 1.33 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 0.95% Great: 1%
Nvidia GTX 550-Ti-$250 54,392 User benchmarks, average bench 9% Zotac(19DA 5194) 1GB Ram: 1GB, Driver: 342.01 Performing above expectations (76^th percentile)	8.96% Terrible	Lighting 10.2 Reflection 14.3 Parallax 9.6 8% 11.4 fps	MRender 15.7 Gravity 11.8 Splatting 10.8 10% 12.8 fps
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 8.96% Great: 9%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
MK-V602-120GB 120GB 4 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 9GB free (System drive) Firmware: Q0517A0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 47 103 60 36 32 36 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	22.9% Poor	Read 195 Write 59 Mixed 9.3 SusWrite 52.4 17% 79 MB/s	4K Read 14.8 4K Write 32.5 4K Mixed 1 41% 16.1 MB/s	DQ Read 22.4 DQ Write 15.5 DQ Mixed 10.6 10% 16.2 MB/s
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 22.9% Great: 64%
Hitachi Deskstar 7K1000.C 1TB-$40 97,793 User benchmarks, average bench 57% 346GB free Firmware: JP4OA3MA SusWrite @10s intervals: 134 131 133 132 134 133 MB/s Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)	70.6% Very good	Read 114 Write 119 Mixed 63.7 SusWrite 133 78% 107 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.8 148% 1 MB/s
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 70.6% Great: 74%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 8GB 82,857 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 0, 0 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing below potential (26^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	25.7% Poor	MC Read 8.6 MC Write 7.3 MC Mixed 6.2 21% 7.37 GB/s	SC Read 8.8 SC Write 9.8 SC Mixed 7.5 25% 8.7 GB/s	Latency 61 66% 61 ns
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 25.7% Great: 51%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical MS-H55 Pro Builds (Compare 3 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 9%

Tree trunk

Desktop 63%

Destroyer

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Maxsun MS-H55 Pro

CPU
Core i7 S 860IntelBench 65%, 85 samples	3x

GPU
GTX 550-TiNvidia $250Bench 9%, 54,392 samples	3x

SSD
MK-V602-120GB 120GBBench 41%, 4 samples	3x

RAM
8GBUnknownBench 34%, 82,857 samples	3x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 8% - Terrible

Total price: $250

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16