Lenovo 90FB0001US

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics5.58% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive95.9% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory20GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 20GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemLenovo 90FB0001US  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 3642
Memory15.5 GB free of 20 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210105
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 20 '21 at 03:34
Run Duration185 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU9%

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-6400-$79
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
71.6% Very good
Memory 76.5
1-Core 103
2-Core 202
72% 127 Pts
4-Core 386
8-Core 390
52% 388 Pts
64-Core 378
23% 378 Pts
Poor: 39%
This bench: 71.6%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 730
Device(1642 3E56) 2GB
CLim: 901 MHz, MLim: 450 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 471.96
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
5.58% Terrible
Lighting 7
Reflection 5.3
Parallax 8.9
6% 7.07 fps
MRender 4.5
Gravity 7.4
Splatting 7.2
5% 6.37 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.58%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX500 250GB-$39
137GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M3CR023
SusWrite @10s intervals: 376 393 395 377 396 411 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
95.9% Outstanding
Read 444
Write 380
Mixed 383
SusWrite 391
90% 400 MB/s
4K Read 34.6
4K Write 71.4
4K Mixed 34
134% 46.7 MB/s
DQ Read 370
DQ Write 237
DQ Mixed 255
203% 287 MB/s
Poor: 73%
This bench: 95.9%
Great: 123%
Hitachi HDS721050CLA660 500GB
330GB free
Firmware: JP2OA41A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 111 111 110 106 111 112 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
58.9% Above average
Read 95.3
Write 108
Mixed 47.6
SusWrite 110
66% 90.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.6
114% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 58.9%
Great: 76%
Seagate ST1000DX001-SSHD-8GB 1TB
718GB free
Firmware: CC61
SusWrite @10s intervals: 178 185 178 176 172 180 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
77.5% Very good
Read 91
Write 185
Mixed 28.9
SusWrite 178
87% 121 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 4.5
4K Mixed 1.9
340% 2.5 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 77.5%
Great: 114%
SanDisk Cruzer Blade 8GB
7GB free, PID 5567
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1.5 2.7 3.5 4.4 4.4 3.9 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
8.23% Terrible
Read 20.2
Write 10.7
Mixed 11.5
SusWrite 3.4
14% 11.5 MB/s
4K Read 3.7
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.6
75% 1.83 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 8.23%
Great: 13%
SanDisk Ultra USB 3.0 64GB
22GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.1 0.7 1.8 1 6.4 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
10.2% Very poor
Read 35.5
Write 10.2
Mixed 12.2
SusWrite 3.7
16% 15.4 MB/s
4K Read 4.8
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 1
86% 2.27 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 10.2%
Great: 40%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CMK16GX4M2A2400C16 0215 CMK16GX4M2A2400C16 Samsung M378A5143EB1-CPB 20GB
2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 8192, 4096 MB
Relative performance (0th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
46.7% Average
MC Read 17
MC Write 18.5
MC Mixed 13.2
46% 16.2 GB/s
SC Read 12
SC Write 16.7
SC Mixed 13.2
40% 14 GB/s
Latency 87.3
46% 87.3 ns
Poor: 56%
This bench: 46.7%
Great: 70%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 9 7 60 23.5" 1280 720 AOC2476 2476WM
Typical 90FB0001US Builds (Compare 138 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 90FB0001US

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 58% - Above average Total price: $155
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback