Asus TUF B450M-PLUS GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 87%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 97%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 86%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 92.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics90.2% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus TUF B450M-PLUS GAMING  (all builds)
Memory9.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210810
Uptime0.9 Days
Run DateSep 20 '21 at 01:18
Run Duration208 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 13%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (70th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X-$190
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
92.1% Outstanding
Memory 89.3
1-Core 152
2-Core 289
97% 177 Pts
4-Core 510
8-Core 951
87% 730 Pts
64-Core 1,302
81% 1,302 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 92.1%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$278
CLim: 2012 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 471.96
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
90.2% Outstanding
Lighting 115
Reflection 116
Parallax 105
94% 112 fps
MRender 96.4
Gravity 107
Splatting 103
84% 102 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 90.2%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel 660p NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$60
14GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 004C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,308
Write 849
Mixed 822
220% 993 MB/s
4K Read 56.5
4K Write 166
4K Mixed 68.8
261% 96.9 MB/s
DQ Read 334
DQ Write 821
DQ Mixed 342
328% 499 MB/s
Poor: 94% Great: 209%
Intel 530 Series 180GB
25GB free
Firmware: DC32
SusWrite @10s intervals: 160 166 183 168 161 183 MB/s
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
78.2% Very good
Read 322
Write 202
Mixed 231
SusWrite 170
52% 231 MB/s
4K Read 33.3
4K Write 90.6
4K Mixed 36.5
145% 53.5 MB/s
DQ Read 276
DQ Write 202
DQ Mixed 135
129% 204 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 78.2%
Great: 82%
Samsung 850 Pro 256GB-$129
172GB free
Firmware: EXM04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 329 337 369 457 457 458 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
112% Outstanding
Read 492
Write 467
Mixed 365
SusWrite 401
97% 431 MB/s
4K Read 33.9
4K Write 105
4K Mixed 45.2
165% 61.5 MB/s
DQ Read 387
DQ Write 358
DQ Mixed 353
270% 366 MB/s
Poor: 71%
This bench: 112%
Great: 124%
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$76
56GB free
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 330 307 281 228 220 209 MB/s
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
113% Outstanding
Read 490
Write 472
Mixed 449
SusWrite 263
94% 419 MB/s
4K Read 41.1
4K Write 105
4K Mixed 58.3
192% 68 MB/s
DQ Read 389
DQ Write 363
DQ Mixed 371
280% 374 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 113%
Great: 129%
Truenas iSCSI Disk 537GB
240GB free
Firmware: 0123
SusWrite @10s intervals: 30 29 30 32 31 31 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
32.1% Below average
Read 79.6
Write 30.7
Mixed 52
SusWrite 30.4
36% 48.2 MB/s
4K Read 4.5
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 3.6
628% 3.43 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 32.1%
Great: 52%
Freenas iSCSI Disk 537GB
493GB free
Firmware: 0123
SusWrite @10s intervals: 31 28 30 31 31 31 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
29.8% Poor
Read 71.6
Write 33.1
Mixed 42.3
SusWrite 30.4
33% 44.3 MB/s
4K Read 4.2
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 3.3
582% 3.23 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 29.8%
Great: 46%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMW16GX4M2C3600C18 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
89.1% Excellent
MC Read 33.2
MC Write 26.6
MC Mixed 34.5
90% 31.4 GB/s
SC Read 26.5
SC Write 26.4
SC Mixed 34.2
83% 29 GB/s
Latency 68.2
59% 68.2 ns
Poor: 62%
This bench: 89.1%
Great: 121%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 5 2 60 31.5" 1280 720 VSCF634 VX3211-2K
Typical TUF B450M-PLUS GAMING Builds (Compare 4,075 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 78%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 73%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asus TUF B450M-PLUS GAMING

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 91% - Outstanding Total price: $422
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback