Asus SABERTOOTH Z77

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 26%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (73rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 27 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics26.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive75.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
MotherboardAsus SABERTOOTH Z77  (all builds)
Memory7.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20130813
Uptime1.4 Days
Run DateSep 19 '21 at 15:09
Run Duration127 Seconds
Run User IND-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3770K-$175
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
78.4% Very good
Memory 91.2
1-Core 108
2-Core 202
78% 134 Pts
4-Core 355
8-Core 517
54% 436 Pts
64-Core 522
32% 522 Pts
Poor: 59%
This bench: 78.4%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 660-Ti-$362
Asus(1043 841E) 2GB
CLim: 1202 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 471.68
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
26.7% Poor
Lighting 31.1
Reflection 30.3
Parallax 43
25% 34.8 fps
MRender 39.1
Gravity 39.4
Splatting 31.3
29% 36.6 fps
Poor: 23%
This bench: 26.7%
Great: 29%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 250GB-$81
72GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X41110WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 232 128 128 94 135 84 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
75.9% Very good
Read 476
Write 458
Mixed 342
SusWrite 134
79% 352 MB/s
4K Read 27.2
4K Write 54.6
4K Mixed 34.1
114% 38.6 MB/s
DQ Read 315
DQ Write 281
DQ Mixed 248
200% 281 MB/s
Poor: 59%
This bench: 75.9%
Great: 100%
WD WD1004FBYZ-01YCBB1 1TB
250GB free
Firmware: RR04
SusWrite @10s intervals: 157 168 149 165 159 159 MB/s
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
89.9% Excellent
Read 152
Write 188
Mixed 107
SusWrite 160
112% 152 MB/s
4K Read 5.6
4K Write 3.6
4K Mixed 1
411% 3.4 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 89.9%
Great: 107%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905403-559.A00LF 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
58.6% Above average
MC Read 21.3
MC Write 20.4
MC Mixed 18.6
57% 20.1 GB/s
SC Read 18.1
SC Write 18
SC Mixed 18.6
52% 18.2 GB/s
Latency 65.5
61% 65.5 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 58.6%
Great: 60%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical SABERTOOTH Z77 Builds (Compare 2,534 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 60%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 49%
Yacht

Motherboard: Asus SABERTOOTH Z77 - $210

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 65% - Good Total price: $757
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes the youtubers that are paid to promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback