Asus M5A99FX PRO R2.0

Performance Results


Gaming 44% Speed boat	Desktop 72% Battleship	Workstation 36% Jet ski


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	63.1% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	63.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (77%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus M5A99FX PRO R2.0 (all builds)
Memory	13 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20140407
Uptime	2.7 Days
Run Date	Aug 13 '17 at 11:50
Run Duration	151 Seconds
Run User	SVK-User
Background CPU	77%

Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (46^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD FX-8350-$130 313,196 User benchmarks, average bench 61% Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	67.1% Good	Memory 86.5 1-Core 72.3 2-Core 142 61% 100 Pts	4-Core 258 8-Core 420 42% 339 Pts	64-Core 416 26% 416 Pts
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 67.1% Great: 68%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117 1,368,019 User benchmarks, average bench 56% MSI(1462 3281) CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 2256 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 384.94 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	63.1% Good	Lighting 79.1 Reflection 76.8 Parallax 67.7 64% 74.5 fps	MRender 78.5 Gravity 70.7 Splatting 72.8 60% 74 fps
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 63.1% Great: 60%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
OCZ Trion 150 240GB-$196 15,660 User benchmarks, average bench 79% 102GB free (System drive) Firmware: SAFZ12.2 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 1418 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 898 (A7) Unknown 100 100 0 (A8) Unknown 100 100 0 (A9) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 184 184 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 61 (C2) HDA temperature 66 61 167505035298 (F1) Unknown 100 100 80007	63.5% Good	Read 496 Write 322 Mixed 336 85% 385 MB/s	4K Read 21.6 4K Write 36.8 4K Mixed 9.42 64% 22.6 MB/s	DQ Read 151 DQ Write 95.5 DQ Mixed 46.3 55% 97.4 MB/s
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 63.5% Great: 95%
Kingston HyperX 3K 240GB-$70 27,495 User benchmarks, average bench 81% 63GB free Firmware: 541ABBF0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 95 95 10660229 (05) Reallocated sector count 99 99 0 (09) Power-on hours count 94 94 -132620000160239 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 2082 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AE) Unknown 0 0 126 (B1) Unknown 0 0 98 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 31 38 68721967135 (C2) HDA temperature 31 38 68721967135 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 120 120 10660229 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 120 120 10660229 (CC) Soft ECC correction 120 120 10660229 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 100 (E7) Temperature 100 100 0 (E9) Unknown 0 0 11634 (EA) Unknown 0 0 7936 (F1) Unknown 0 0 7936 (F2) Unknown 0 0 10384	65.7% Good	Read 482 Write 170 Mixed 319 71% 324 MB/s	4K Read 28.5 4K Write 61.9 4K Mixed 17.6 98% 36 MB/s	DQ Read 174 DQ Write 149 DQ Mixed 82.2 83% 135 MB/s
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 65.7% Great: 94%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$37 815,515 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 662GB free Firmware: CC43 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (35^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 105 99 7537224 (03) Spinup time 95 95 0 (04) Start/Stop count 98 98 2117 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 69 60 8607458533 (09) Power-on hours count 94 94 5663 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 2076 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 99 17180131332 (BD) vendor-specific 99 99 1 (BE) vendor-specific 64 56 605683748 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 79 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 98 98 4674 (C2) HDA temperature 36 44 73014444068 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 -47768626260557 (F1) Unknown 100 253 13795270925 (F2) Unknown 100 253 288089254660	82.3% Excellent	Read 153 Write 134 Mixed 126 104% 138 MB/s	4K Read 0.68 4K Write 1.31 4K Mixed 0.19 74% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 82.3% Great: 114%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HyperX DDR3 1866 C9 4x4GB 3,839 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 4 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 800 MHz Performing below potential (23^rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	46.9% Average	MC Read 19 MC Write 14.5 MC Mixed 16.7 48% 16.7 GB/s	SC Read 10.1 SC Write 8.5 SC Mixed 13 30% 10.5 GB/s	Latency 70.8 56% 70.8 ns
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 46.9% Great: 87%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical M5A99FX PRO R2.0 Builds (Compare 1,067 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 34%

Sail boat

Desktop 69%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 28%

Raft

Motherboard: Asus M5A99FX PRO R2.0 - $200

CPU
FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples	567x
FX-8320AMD $125Bench 59%, 106,454 samples	138x
FX-6300AMD $90Bench 55%, 261,607 samples	80x

GPU
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	67x
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	62x
GTX 1070Nvidia $278Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	60x

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $76Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	42x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $76Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	40x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	33x

RAM
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 59%, 122,541 samples	37x
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBCorsairBench 53%, 34,385 samples	24x
Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 54%, 77,652 samples	18x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 58% - Above average

Total price: $606

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16