Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 69%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 98%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 64%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics75.4% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive216% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (91%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory29 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210320
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 19 '21 at 02:06
Run Duration148 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 91%
Watch Gameplay: Vega-56 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 5600X-$120
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.35 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
84.1% Excellent
Memory 87.3
1-Core 154
2-Core 308
99% 183 Pts
4-Core 435
8-Core 729
71% 582 Pts
64-Core 989
61% 989 Pts
Poor: 83%
This bench: 84.1%
Great: 107%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX Vega-56-$170
CLim: 1590 MHz, MLim: 800 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 21.9.1
Performing below potential (31st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
75.4% Very good
Lighting 95.7
Reflection 104
Parallax 148
78% 116 fps
MRender 85.9
Gravity 104
Splatting 73.2
70% 87.6 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 75.4%
Great: 85%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue SN500 NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$37
256GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 201000WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 982 741 627 484 488 486 MB/s
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
216% Outstanding
Read 1,231
Write 1,318
Mixed 1118
SusWrite 635
242% 1,075 MB/s
4K Read 49.8
4K Write 181
4K Mixed 74.7
267% 102 MB/s
DQ Read 1,063
DQ Write 1,001
DQ Mixed 1,048
782% 1,037 MB/s
Poor: 133%
This bench: 216%
Great: 228%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2018)-$50
770GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 166 174 171 172 173 175 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
84.5% Excellent
Read 123
Write 164
Mixed 69
SusWrite 172
96% 132 MB/s
4K Read 1.7
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.1
93% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 84.5%
Great: 106%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$28
161GB free
Firmware: MS2OA800
SusWrite @10s intervals: 172 174 169 175 177 177 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
95% Outstanding
Read 157
Write 172
Mixed 35.7
SusWrite 174
97% 135 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.5
130% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 95%
Great: 107%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMW16GX4M2C3200C16 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
91.5% Outstanding
MC Read 40.4
MC Write 23.8
MC Mixed 34.9
94% 33 GB/s
SC Read 26.5
SC Write 22.6
SC Mixed 31.4
77% 26.8 GB/s
Latency 70.2
57% 70.2 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 91.5%
Great: 114%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 9 7 144 23.8" 1280 720 AOC2402 24G2W1G4
Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS Builds (Compare 6,881 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS - $185

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 86% - Excellent Total price: $1,023
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback