Asus ROG STRIX B550-F GAMING (WI-FI)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 102%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 94%
Nuclear submarine
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics113% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (59%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus ROG STRIX B550-F GAMING (WI-FI)  (all builds)
Memory9.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210810
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 19 '21 at 00:55
Run Duration251 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 59%
Watch Gameplay: 3080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (71st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3600-$86
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.95 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
88.5% Excellent
Memory 79.9
1-Core 138
2-Core 270
88% 163 Pts
4-Core 521
8-Core 801
82% 661 Pts
64-Core 1,018
63% 1,018 Pts
Poor: 73%
This bench: 88.5%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3080-$879
EVGA(3842 4897) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 4750 MHz, Ram: 10GB, Driver: 471.96
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Disable monitor sync before benchmarking (143 fps cap detected)
113% Outstanding
Lighting 142
Reflection 143
Parallax 142
116% 142 fps
MRender 143
Gravity 143
Splatting 143
117% 143 fps
Poor: 163%
This bench: 113%
Great: 202%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Black SN750 NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB (2019)-$75
17GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 111110WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,003
Write 2,262
Mixed 1,771
450% 2,012 MB/s
4K Read 51.2
4K Write 192
4K Mixed 77.7
278% 107 MB/s
DQ Read 973
DQ Write 912
DQ Mixed 930
702% 938 MB/s
Poor: 168% Great: 297%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94
7GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 494
Write 486
Mixed 408
103% 463 MB/s
4K Read 45
4K Write 115
4K Mixed 61.9
208% 73.9 MB/s
DQ Read 387
DQ Write 364
DQ Mixed 372
280% 374 MB/s
Poor: 80% Great: 134%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 5TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 0.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 482 188 81 83 84 84 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
101% Outstanding
Read 508
Write 487
Mixed 405
SusWrite 167
88% 392 MB/s
4K Read 34.5
4K Write 112
4K Mixed 49.6
175% 65.3 MB/s
DQ Read 381
DQ Write 364
DQ Mixed 372
279% 372 MB/s
Poor: 85%
This bench: 101%
Great: 105%
WD WD20NPVT-00Z2TT0 2TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 100 104 100 105 102 102 MB/s
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
55.4% Above average
Read 90.7
Write 92.5
Mixed 43.5
SusWrite 102
60% 82.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.7
137% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 55.4%
Great: 61%
WD My Book 25DA 4TB
559GB free, PID 25da
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 105 104 105 106 106 106 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
47.1% Average
Read 114
Write 118
Mixed 96.4
SusWrite 105
147% 108 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1
119% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 47.1%
Great: 68%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB-$39
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
83.6% Excellent
MC Read 33.1
MC Write 24
MC Mixed 32.8
86% 30 GB/s
SC Read 23.3
SC Write 23.7
SC Mixed 31.1
74% 26 GB/s
Latency 80.7
50% 80.7 ns
Poor: 63%
This bench: 83.6%
Great: 109%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 9 7 144 27" 1280 720 SAM0E16 C27HG7x
Typical ROG STRIX B550-F GAMING (WI-FI) Builds (Compare 9,597 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 142%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX B550-F GAMING (WI-FI) - $199

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 88% - Excellent Total price: $967
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year so they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback