Asus TUF Z270 MARK 2

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 82%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 73%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics96.4% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (28%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
2 years ago, 20 months ago.
MotherboardAsus TUF Z270 MARK 2  (all builds)
Memory11.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180314
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 18 '21 at 23:31
Run Duration179 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 28%

 PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700K-$230
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.5 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
87.2% Excellent
Memory 87.9
1-Core 137
2-Core 274
91% 166 Pts
4-Core 465
8-Core 787
76% 626 Pts
64-Core 790
49% 790 Pts
Poor: 71%
This bench: 87.2%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-Ti-$299
Zotac(19DA 2445) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 471.96
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
96.4% Outstanding
Lighting 121
Reflection 133
Parallax 122
99% 125 fps
MRender 95.3
Gravity 126
Splatting 113
92% 112 fps
Poor: 86%
This bench: 96.4%
Great: 101%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel Optane+224G 240GB
21GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 16.5
SusWrite @10s intervals: 34 18 158 230 269 264 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
Poor: 33% Great: 88%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016)-$51
325GB free
Firmware: CC26
SusWrite @10s intervals: 142 141 140 143 145 144 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
77.2% Very good
Read 127
Write 96.2
Mixed 76
SusWrite 142
81% 110 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
132% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 77.2%
Great: 114%
WD Black 1TB (2013)-$48
865GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 108 104 107 109 108 109 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
61.5% Good
Read 106
Write 102
Mixed 61.9
SusWrite 108
69% 94.4 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 1.1
217% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 61.5%
Great: 108%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2133 C13 2x8GB-$46
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (34th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
67.7% Good
MC Read 25.9
MC Write 26
MC Mixed 19.4
68% 23.8 GB/s
SC Read 17.6
SC Write 25.4
SC Mixed 18.8
59% 20.6 GB/s
Latency 69.7
57% 69.7 ns
Poor: 42%
This bench: 67.7%
Great: 80%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 52: 10R 0G 2B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
52% 36% 33 339 278 60 24.5" 1920 1080 SPT0ABF C27
Typical TUF Z270 MARK 2 Builds (Compare 1,911 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 71%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 61%
Destroyer

Motherboard: Asus TUF Z270 MARK 2 - $129

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 96% - Outstanding Total price: $634
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $290Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback