Acer Nitro AN515-54

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 29%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 25%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (27th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 73 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics38.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive104% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (27%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAcer Nitro AN515-54  (all builds)
MotherboardCFL Octavia_CFS
Memory25.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.9 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit farger, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit farger, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit farger, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit farger
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200916
Uptime1.2 Days
Run DateSep 18 '21 at 14:24
Run Duration207 Seconds
Run User NOR-User
Background CPU 27%

 PC Performing below expectations (27th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-9300H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
59.9% Above average
Memory 77.1
1-Core 71
2-Core 132
57% 93.4 Pts
4-Core 232
8-Core 345
36% 288 Pts
64-Core 369
23% 369 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 59.9%
Great: 81%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630
Acer(1025 1331) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.6911
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
5.36% Terrible
Lighting 5.6
Reflection 7.9
Parallax 5.9
5% 6.47 fps
MRender 8.6
Gravity 6.1
Splatting 10
7% 8.23 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 5.36%
Great: 6%
Nvidia GTX 1650 (Mobile)
Acer(1025 1332) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 471.96
Performing below potential (22nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
38.3% Below average
Lighting 50.1
Reflection 53.7
Parallax 44.4
41% 49.4 fps
MRender 36.3
Gravity 43.9
Splatting 41.8
34% 40.7 fps
Poor: 28%
This bench: 38.3%
Great: 46%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
HFM256GDJTNG-8310A 256GB
55GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 80002C00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 223 219 212 208 159 205 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
104% Outstanding
Read 916
Write 218
Mixed 349
SusWrite 204
92% 422 MB/s
4K Read 30.6
4K Write 72.6
4K Mixed 33.4
128% 45.5 MB/s
DQ Read 495
DQ Write 237
DQ Mixed 288
235% 340 MB/s
Poor: 78%
This bench: 104%
Great: 153%
HFS512G32MND-3210A 512GB
167GB free
Firmware: 20400P00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 341 274 272 271 231 303 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
71.6% Very good
Read 332
Write 249
Mixed 330
SusWrite 282
67% 298 MB/s
4K Read 21
4K Write 49.3
4K Mixed 27.8
94% 32.7 MB/s
DQ Read 368
DQ Write 173
DQ Mixed 292
211% 277 MB/s
Poor: 62%
This bench: 71.6%
Great: 106%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 997GB
846GB free
Firmware: 0.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1230 1237 1308 1210 918 1132 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 47% Great: 134%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR4 2933 C17 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB SODIMM DDR4 2933 MHz clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing below potential (4th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
73.8% Very good
MC Read 27.4
MC Write 29.4
MC Mixed 26.4
79% 27.7 GB/s
SC Read 11.2
SC Write 22.3
SC Mixed 16.2
47% 16.6 GB/s
Latency 86.2
46% 86.2 ns
Poor: 75%
This bench: 73.8%
Great: 98%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 10 7 60 15.5" 1280 720 AUO21ED
Typical Nitro AN515-54 Builds (Compare 11,804 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Nitro AN515-54

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $23Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback