Gigabyte X570 AORUS MASTER

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 208%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 235%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (79th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 21 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 100%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics211% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive464% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
MotherboardGigabyte X570 AORUS MASTER  (all builds)
Memory28.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191206
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 18 '21 at 13:44
Run Duration396 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (79th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 3900X-$395
AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.25 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
100% Outstanding
Memory 85.4
1-Core 158
2-Core 312
100% 185 Pts
4-Core 617
8-Core 1,206
108% 911 Pts
64-Core 2,198
136% 2,198 Pts
Poor: 80%
This bench: 100%
Great: 97%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3090-$1,198
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 4875 MHz, Ram: 24GB, Driver: 471.41
Performing below potential (53rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
211% Outstanding
Lighting 310
Reflection 284
Parallax 328
253% 308 fps
MRender 359
Gravity 259
Splatting 182
209% 267 fps
Poor: 185%
This bench: 211%
Great: 230%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Gigabyte Aorus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$80
836GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EGFM11.3 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3582 3808 3869 3888 3923 3925 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
464% Outstanding
Read 2,039
Write 3,661
Mixed 2272
SusWrite 3,833
672% 2,951 MB/s
4K Read 51.6
4K Write 202
4K Mixed 89.3
299% 114 MB/s
DQ Read 1,420
DQ Write 1,070
DQ Mixed 1,207
913% 1,233 MB/s
Poor: 215%
This bench: 464%
Great: 491%
Samsung 860 QVO 1TB-$109
48GB free
Firmware: RVQ02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 450 209 81 82 83 82 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
89.9% Excellent
Read 506
Write 147
Mixed 406
SusWrite 165
68% 306 MB/s
4K Read 34.2
4K Write 95.6
4K Mixed 47.1
163% 59 MB/s
DQ Read 219
DQ Write 186
DQ Mixed 200
151% 202 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 89.9%
Great: 121%
Pcie SSD 1TB
448GB free
Firmware: ECFM22.4 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1569 574 572 574 575 573 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
256% Outstanding
Read 1,631
Write 2,464
Mixed 1,729
SusWrite 739
371% 1,641 MB/s
4K Read 48.6
4K Write 169
4K Mixed 82.9
269% 100 MB/s
DQ Read 1,547
DQ Write 1,220
DQ Mixed 1,328
1,009% 1,365 MB/s
Poor: 112%
This bench: 256%
Great: 284%
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$157
277GB free
Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1561 1175 1038 1064 1127 1094 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
319% Outstanding
Read 2,491
Write 2,379
Mixed 1,733
SusWrite 1,176
436% 1945 MB/s
4K Read 64.9
4K Write 158
4K Mixed 88.9
296% 104 MB/s
DQ Read 1,426
DQ Write 1084
DQ Mixed 1,197
911% 1,236 MB/s
Poor: 214%
This bench: 319%
Great: 372%
TOSHIBA HDWE140 4TB
3TB free, PID 2773
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 175 176 176 176 175 175 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
75% Very good
Read 182
Write 176
Mixed 78.8
SusWrite 176
203% 153 MB/s
4K Read 12.9
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1.1
167% 5.47 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 75%
Great: 73%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown TEAMGROUP-UD4-3200 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
113% Outstanding
MC Read 45.6
MC Write 40.2
MC Mixed 40.1
120% 42 GB/s
SC Read 27.7
SC Write 24
SC Mixed 38.9
86% 30.2 GB/s
Latency 71.7
56% 71.7 ns
Poor: 69%
This bench: 113%
Great: 109%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 28: 3R 3G 4B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
28% 29% 34 108 6 165 31.5" 2560 1440 DELD0F4 DELL S3220DGF
Typical GA-X570 AORUS MASTER Builds (Compare 5,048 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 184%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 201%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte X570 AORUS MASTER - $479

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 68% - Good Total price: $1,725
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback