Asus 1025C

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (19th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 81 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 25.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Boot Drive34.9% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemAsus 1025C  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK 1025C
Memory2 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display800 x 600 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130816
Uptime0.5 Days
Run DateSep 18 '21 at 12:33
Run Duration126 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Atom N2800
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.85 GHz, turbo 1.85 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
25.9% Poor
Memory 47.7
1-Core 8.1
2-Core 15.5
20% 23.8 Pts
4-Core 26.7
8-Core 26.9
4% 26.8 Pts
64-Core 26.7
2% 26.7 Pts
Poor: 17%
This bench: 25.9%
Great: 29%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
204GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 145 146 147 147 147 147 MB/s
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
34.9% Below average
Read 228
Write 142
Mixed 169
SusWrite 146
38% 171 MB/s
4K Read 13
4K Write 13.7
4K Mixed 13.2
44% 13.3 MB/s
DQ Read 83.2
DQ Write 59.9
DQ Mixed 74.6
55% 72.6 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 34.9%
Great: 124%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B5273DH0-CH9 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR3 1066 MHz
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
13.7% Very poor
MC Read 5.4
MC Write 4.4
MC Mixed 3.8
13% 4.53 GB/s
SC Read 2.9
SC Write 4.3
SC Mixed 3.7
10% 3.63 GB/s
Latency 169
24% 169 ns
Poor: 13%
This bench: 13.7%
Great: 29%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 1025C Builds (Compare 1 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete

System: Asus 1025C

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback