Gigabyte GA-A320M-S2H-CF

Performance Results


Gaming 23% Surfboard	Desktop 81% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 21% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (74th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 26 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	17.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	72.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

System	Gigabyte A320M-S2H
Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-A320M-S2H-CF (all builds)
Memory	11.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.4 GHz
Display	1360 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20210803
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Sep 18 '21 at 06:53
Run Duration	125 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	6%

PC Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 3400G-$98 93,718 User benchmarks, average bench 68% AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	77.1% Very good	Memory 72.3 1-Core 124 2-Core 244 80% 147 Pts	4-Core 440 8-Core 662 68% 551 Pts	64-Core 661 41% 661 Pts
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 77.1% Great: 78%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon RX Vega 11 Graphics 47,368 User benchmarks, average bench 16% Gigabyte(1458 D000) 2GB Ram: 2GB, Driver: 21.8.2 Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	17.8% Very poor	Lighting 23.2 Reflection 17.6 Parallax 32.5 19% 24.4 fps	MRender 15.7 Gravity 26.4 Splatting 16 16% 19.4 fps
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 17.8% Great: 18%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston SA400M8240G 240GB 950 User benchmarks, average bench 68% 88GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFK SusWrite @10s intervals: 204 154 94 71 79 75 MB/s Performing as expected (54^th percentile)	72.4% Very good	Read 468 Write 308 Mixed 336 SusWrite 113 68% 306 MB/s	4K Read 33.1 4K Write 71.5 4K Mixed 35.5 134% 46.7 MB/s	DQ Read 226 DQ Write 35.1 DQ Mixed 30.3 48% 97.2 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 72.4% Great: 89%
WD Blue 2.5" 320GB (2009)-$71 42,987 User benchmarks, average bench 29% 207GB free Firmware: 11.01A11 SusWrite @10s intervals: 39 40 40 40 39 40 MB/s Performing as expected (54^th percentile)	29.2% Poor	Read 61.9 Write 63.5 Mixed 42.4 SusWrite 39.5 38% 51.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.7 124% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 29.2% Great: 41%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown CB8GU2400.C8NT CB8GU2400.C8ET 16GB 22 User benchmarks, average bench 92% 3400, 3400 MHz 8192, 8192 MB Performing above expectations (70^th percentile)	95.7% Outstanding	MC Read 35.1 MC Write 36.8 MC Mixed 31.6 99% 34.5 GB/s	SC Read 23.4 SC Write 42.4 SC Mixed 27.4 89% 31.1 GB/s	Latency 96.1 42% 96.1 ns
Poor: 77% ↑ This bench: 95.7% Great: 97%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-A320M-S2H-CF Builds (Compare 7,637 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 39%

Jet ski

Desktop 79%

Battleship

Workstation 36%

Jet ski

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-A320M-S2H-CF - $70

CPU
Ryzen 5 2600AMD $155Bench 73%, 179,588 samples	816x
Ryzen 3 3200GAMD $75Bench 63%, 104,122 samples	783x
Ryzen 3 2200GAMD $104Bench 60%, 181,631 samples	743x

GPU
RX 570AMD $130Bench 45%, 473,685 samples	772x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	447x
RX 580AMD $140Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	413x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	346x
Green 240GB (2018)WD $52Bench 45%, 156,194 samples	183x
SU630 240GBAdataBench 64%, 60,212 samples	169x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $45Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	258x
DDR4 3000 2x8GBAdataBench 80%, 77,202 samples	194x
TEAMGROUP-UD4-3200 2x8GBUnknownBench 85%, 99,207 samples	145x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 88% - Excellent

Total price: $428

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16