Lenovo 20HJA025LM

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (84th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 16 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics19.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory48GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 48GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemLenovo 20HJA025LM  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 20HJA025LM
Memory40.9 GB free of 48 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210505
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateSep 17 '21 at 22:09
Run Duration144 Seconds
Run User MEX-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (84th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E3-1505M v6
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
79.9% Very good
Memory 84
1-Core 118
2-Core 229
81% 144 Pts
4-Core 409
8-Core 608
63% 508 Pts
64-Core 608
38% 608 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 79.9%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro M2200
Legend(17AA 224D) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 30.0.14.7168
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
19.7% Very poor
Lighting 23.4
Reflection 50.1
Parallax 31.7
19% 35.1 fps
MRender 28.3
Gravity 25.7
Splatting 23.5
21% 25.8 fps
Poor: 17%
This bench: 19.7%
Great: 20%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
LENSE10256GMSP34MEAT2MA 256GB
37GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2.3.2902
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,208
Write 909
Mixed 667
205% 928 MB/s
4K Read 44.9
4K Write 105
4K Mixed 59.4
200% 69.9 MB/s
DQ Read 691
DQ Write 557
DQ Mixed 560
437% 603 MB/s
Poor: 92% Great: 199%
Sandisk PLUS 480 GB 480GB
387GB free
Firmware: UC1700RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 334 277 100 4.7 44 4.7 MB/s
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
49.6% Average
Read 421
Write 306
Mixed 267
SusWrite 127
62% 280 MB/s
4K Read 18.4
4K Write 31.9
4K Mixed 16.8
66% 22.4 MB/s
DQ Read 122
DQ Write 95.2
DQ Mixed 42.2
50% 86.4 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 49.6%
Great: 57%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA41GS6AFR8N-TF 04CB Samsung M474A1G43EB1-CRC 04CB 48GB
2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 16384, 8192, 16384 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
73.6% Very good
MC Read 25.7
MC Write 28.6
MC Mixed 23.7
74% 26 GB/s
SC Read 16.4
SC Write 29.6
SC Mixed 23.1
66% 23 GB/s
Latency 73.4
54% 73.4 ns
Poor: 68%
This bench: 73.6%
Great: 71%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 12 10 60 15.6" 1280 720 LEN40BA
Typical 20HJA025LM Builds (Compare 14 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard

System: Lenovo 20HJA025LM

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback