Gigabyte H410M H

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 31%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics33.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive76.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
MotherboardGigabyte H410M H  (all builds)
Memory5.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200527
Uptime1 Days
Run DateSep 17 '21 at 17:04
Run Duration152 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU 14%

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-10100F-$70
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
84.1% Excellent
Memory 84.4
1-Core 132
2-Core 262
88% 159 Pts
4-Core 451
8-Core 714
72% 583 Pts
64-Core 730
45% 730 Pts
Poor: 69%
This bench: 84.1%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 960-$198
CLim: 1493 MHz, MLim: 1800 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
33.7% Below average
Lighting 43.1
Reflection 45.5
Parallax 42.7
35% 43.8 fps
MRender 38.4
Gravity 39.9
Splatting 35.4
31% 37.9 fps
Poor: 30%
This bench: 33.7%
Great: 36%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Patriot Burst 240GB
100GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFMP1.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 300 58 146 113 49 119 MB/s
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
76.3% Very good
Read 201
Write 93.1
Mixed 339
SusWrite 131
43% 191 MB/s
4K Read 38
4K Write 87.7
4K Mixed 38.8
154% 54.8 MB/s
DQ Read 281
DQ Write 324
DQ Mixed 219
188% 275 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 76.3%
Great: 94%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$28
349GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 137 146 146 149 149 149 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
82% Excellent
Read 140
Write 139
Mixed 90.9
SusWrite 146
95% 129 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 1.2
230% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 82%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 3200 C16 Series 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (22nd percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
40.2% Average
MC Read 15
MC Write 14
MC Mixed 10.8
38% 13.3 GB/s
SC Read 12.1
SC Write 14.3
SC Mixed 12.4
37% 12.9 GB/s
Latency 72.8
55% 72.8 ns
Poor: 35%
This bench: 40.2%
Great: 63%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 46: 3R 7G 10B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
46% 28% 72 285 180 70 0" 1680 1050
Typical GA-H410M H Builds (Compare 3,289 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 39%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Gigabyte H410M H - $70

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 80% - Excellent Total price: $426
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes the youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback