Fujitsu LIFEBOOK T935

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics3.34% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive94.1% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (77%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemFujitsu LIFEBOOK T935  (all builds)
MotherboardFUJITSU FJNB288
Memory10.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20141225
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 17 '21 at 01:55
Run Duration135 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 77%

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-5300U
Onboard, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
56.5% Above average
Memory 74
1-Core 87.8
2-Core 151
62% 104 Pts
4-Core 230
8-Core 215
30% 222 Pts
64-Core 220
14% 220 Pts
Poor: 16%
This bench: 56.5%
Great: 56%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 5500 (Mobile 0.95 GHz)
Fujitsu(10CF 1898) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4963
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
3.34% Terrible
Lighting 4.1
Reflection 1.8
Parallax 5.9
3% 3.93 fps
MRender 3.8
Gravity 4.2
Splatting 4.2
3% 4.07 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.34%
Great: 4%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Pro 1TB-$175
503GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXM02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 271 314 326 229 342 376 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
94.1% Outstanding
Read 468
Write 397
Mixed 356
SusWrite 310
86% 383 MB/s
4K Read 32.4
4K Write 68.3
4K Mixed 40.4
137% 47 MB/s
DQ Read 384
DQ Write 238
DQ Mixed 15.7
91% 212 MB/s
Poor: 77%
This bench: 94.1%
Great: 124%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT204864BF160B.M16 1x16GB
1 of 1 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
29.9% Poor
MC Read 11
MC Write 10.2
MC Mixed 8.5
28% 9.9 GB/s
SC Read 9.6
SC Write 9.2
SC Mixed 8.8
26% 9.2 GB/s
Latency 92.6
43% 92.6 ns
Poor: 22%
This bench: 29.9%
Great: 32%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 8 6 60 13.3" 1280 720 SHP141B LQ133M1JW01
Typical LIFEBOOK T935 Builds (Compare 21 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: Fujitsu LIFEBOOK T935

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback