Asus Pro WS WRX80E-SAGE SE WIFI

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 170%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 95%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 315%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics212% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive306% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory256GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 256GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
MotherboardAsus Pro WS WRX80E-SAGE SE WIFI  (all builds)
Memory244.1 GB free of 256 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210317
Uptime1.1 Days
Run DateSep 17 '21 at 00:58
Run Duration386 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX 32-Cores
SP3, 1 CPU, 32 cores, 64 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
80.8% Excellent
Memory 72.9
1-Core 153
2-Core 299
93% 175 Pts
4-Core 473
8-Core 1,139
92% 806 Pts
64-Core 5431
336% 5431 Pts
Poor: 81%
This bench: 80.8%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX A6000
Nvidia(10DE 1459) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 4000 MHz, Ram: 48GB, Driver: 471.68
Performing below potential (74th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
212% Outstanding
Lighting 312
Reflection 294
Parallax 338
255% 315 fps
MRender 329
Gravity 275
Splatting 192
209% 265 fps
Poor: 174%
This bench: 212%
Great: 218%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Amd-raid Array 7 2TB
1TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 9.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2092 1987 1975 1964 1961 1937 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
306% Outstanding
Read 2,615
Write 3,951
Mixed 1,536
SusWrite 1,986
569% 2,522 MB/s
4K Read 31
4K Write 101
4K Mixed 43.3
156% 58.5 MB/s
DQ Read 691
DQ Write 749
DQ Mixed 591
480% 677 MB/s
Poor: 71%
This bench: 306%
Great: 318%
Amd-raid Array 8 4TB
521GB free
Firmware: 9.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4063 3825 3802 3793 3781 3803 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
512% Outstanding
Read 3,803
Write 7,879
Mixed 3,959
SusWrite 3,844
1,106% 4,871 MB/s
4K Read 52.6
4K Write 206
4K Mixed 77.7
288% 112 MB/s
DQ Read 813
DQ Write 823
DQ Mixed 816
614% 817 MB/s
Poor: 227%
This bench: 512%
Great: 500%
Amd-raid Array 5 4TB
1TB free
Firmware: 9.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3284 2102 1558 1560 1563 1567 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
318% Outstanding
Read 2,181
Write 3,186
Mixed 1,860
SusWrite 1,939
518% 2,292 MB/s
4K Read 61.5
4K Write 107
4K Mixed 74.1
245% 80.8 MB/s
DQ Read 730
DQ Write 879
DQ Mixed 708
560% 772 MB/s
Poor: 119%
This bench: 318%
Great: 407%
Amd-raid ST12000DM0007-2G 12TB
338GB free
Firmware: DN01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 112 122 123 123 123 123 MB/s
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
94.2% Outstanding
Read 199
Write 174
Mixed 93.6
SusWrite 121
108% 147 MB/s
4K Read 22.5
4K Write 4.9
4K Mixed 1.4
1,184% 9.6 MB/s
Poor: 83%
This bench: 94.2%
Great: 128%
Amd-raid ST14000DM001-2JC 14TB
1TB free
Firmware: DN01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 132 145 145 146 147 146 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
78.3% Very good
Read 123
Write 109
Mixed 55
SusWrite 144
78% 108 MB/s
4K Read 18.1
4K Write 4.3
4K Mixed 1.2
967% 7.87 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 78.3%
Great: 141%
Amd-raid ST10000DM0004-1Z 10TB
9TB free
Firmware: DN01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 223 237 238 238 239 239 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
136% Outstanding
Read 232
Write 221
Mixed 95.2
SusWrite 236
143% 196 MB/s
4K Read 17.7
4K Write 4.7
4K Mixed 1.2
958% 7.87 MB/s
Poor: 103%
This bench: 136%
Great: 133%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA84GR7CJR4N-XN 8x31.9GB
8 of 8 slots used
255GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
178% Outstanding
MC Read 78
MC Write 47.5
MC Mixed 89.5
205% 71.7 GB/s
SC Read 21.9
SC Write 23.7
SC Mixed 39.4
81% 28.3 GB/s
Latency 94.9
42% 94.9 ns
Poor: 124%
This bench: 178%
Great: 238%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 8 7 24 27" 1280 720 HWP3103 HP Z27x
Typical Pro WS WRX80E-SAGE SE WIFI Builds (Compare 333 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 182%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 95%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 319%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus Pro WS WRX80E-SAGE SE WIFI

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 58% - Above average Total price: $1,358
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback