Acidanthera iMac17,1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 105%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 96%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 81%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics122% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive77.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (37%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemAcidanthera iMac17,1  (all builds)
MotherboardAcidanthera Mac-DB15BD556843C820
Memory7.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 3 GHz
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210105
Uptime2.5 Days
Run DateSep 16 '21 at 20:24
Run Duration252 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 37%

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-6600K-$59
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 4.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
83.8% Excellent
Memory 96
1-Core 145
2-Core 288
98% 176 Pts
4-Core 415
8-Core 414
55% 414 Pts
64-Core 409
25% 409 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 83.8%
Great: 85%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$499
CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 466.11
Performing below potential (40th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
122% Outstanding
Lighting 164
Reflection 182
Parallax 175
134% 174 fps
MRender 128
Gravity 178
Splatting 119
114% 142 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 122%
Great: 133%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 750 EVO 250GB-$130
82GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MAT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 89 113 147 101 124 135 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
77.2% Very good
Read 421
Write 136
Mixed 169
SusWrite 118
46% 211 MB/s
4K Read 30.5
4K Write 90.9
4K Mixed 35.6
140% 52.3 MB/s
DQ Read 373
DQ Write 97
DQ Mixed 159
136% 209 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 77.2%
Great: 114%
Sandisk S3 1T02 1TB
305GB free
Firmware: 40101000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 341 325 392 404 346 326 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
106% Outstanding
Read 396
Write 393
Mixed 349
SusWrite 356
84% 373 MB/s
4K Read 36.6
4K Write 109
4K Mixed 45.6
172% 63.8 MB/s
DQ Read 386
DQ Write 305
DQ Mixed 244
210% 312 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 106%
Great: 122%
Crucial MX500 2TB-$155
1.5TB free
Firmware: M3CR033
SusWrite @10s intervals: 332 315 381 393 338 318 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
109% Outstanding
Read 459
Write 413
Mixed 367
SusWrite 346
89% 396 MB/s
4K Read 35.4
4K Write 106
4K Mixed 47.9
171% 63 MB/s
DQ Read 379
DQ Write 350
DQ Mixed 288
237% 339 MB/s
Poor: 83%
This bench: 109%
Great: 125%
Sandisk PLUS 1000GB
446GB free
Firmware: UH4400RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 152 123 100 168 75 153 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
44.6% Average
Read 398
Write 303
Mixed 129
SusWrite 128
53% 239 MB/s
4K Read 15.5
4K Write 34
4K Mixed 14.2
60% 21.2 MB/s
DQ Read 119
DQ Write 5.5
DQ Mixed 30.1
30% 51.5 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 44.6%
Great: 58%
Seagate Expansion Desk 3TB
15GB free
Firmware: 0911
SusWrite @10s intervals: 76 83 82 84 85 87 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
40.1% Average
Read 55.1
Write 78.3
Mixed 93.5
SusWrite 82.9
58% 77.4 MB/s
4K Read 2.9
4K Write 4
4K Mixed 0.5
250% 2.47 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 40.1%
Great: 103%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB-$48
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3000 MHz
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
95.5% Outstanding
MC Read 30.1
MC Write 37.9
MC Mixed 33.7
97% 33.9 GB/s
SC Read 18.4
SC Write 37.5
SC Mixed 29.5
81% 28.5 GB/s
Latency 54.1
74% 54.1 ns
Poor: 58%
This bench: 95.5%
Great: 104%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 40: 4R 5G 5B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
40% 29% 49 330 267 120 34.1" 3440 1440 GSM7727 34GK950F
History: Score 47: 5R 5G 7B | Score 40: 4R 5G 5B
Typical iMac17,1 Builds (Compare 46 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 38%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 30%
Sail boat

System: Acidanthera iMac17,1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 83% - Excellent Total price: $224
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback