HP Z800 Workstation

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics19.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive30.6% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemHP Z800 Workstation  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 0AECh
Memory7.9 GB free of 12.002 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit färger
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130715
Uptime1.7 Days
Run DateSep 16 '21 at 14:44
Run Duration170 Seconds
Run User SWE-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing below expectations (35th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5630
CPU0 PROCESSOR, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.55 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
61.2% Good
Memory 80.5
1-Core 64.1
2-Core 130
56% 91.5 Pts
4-Core 228
8-Core 336
35% 282 Pts
64-Core 336
21% 336 Pts
Poor: 52%
This bench: 61.2%
Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD HD 7850-$174
Sapphire(174B E221) 1GB
CLim: 860 MHz, MLim: 1200 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 20.10.35.02
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
19.1% Very poor
Lighting 24.1
Reflection 31.8
Parallax 0.2
20% 18.7 fps
MRender 25.2
Gravity 21.1
Splatting 20.8
18% 22.4 fps
Poor: 18%
This bench: 19.1%
Great: 21%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
HyperX Savage 480GB-$198
241GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 00.U
SusWrite @10s intervals: 112 88 93 120 122 124 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
30.6% Below average
Read 120
Write 122
Mixed 115
SusWrite 110
26% 117 MB/s
4K Read 12.4
4K Write 21.1
4K Mixed 14.4
48% 16 MB/s
DQ Read 86.8
DQ Write 95.6
DQ Mixed 49.5
49% 77.3 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 30.6%
Great: 97%
MyMedia MyUSB Drive 64GB
16GB free, PID 0001
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 13 3.4 6.7 4.2 5.9 6.7 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
4.99% Terrible
Read 19.6
Write 14.4
Mixed 17.4
SusWrite 6.6
19% 14.5 MB/s
4K Read 3
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0.1
14% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 4.99%
Great: 8%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown ID:02 FE EBJ41HE4BDFD-DJ-F ID:02 FE EBJ41HE4BDFD-DJ-F ID:02 FE EBJ41HE4BDFD-DJ-F 46GB
1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 34816 MB
Performing below potential (32nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
43.1% Average
MC Read 15.9
MC Write 12.4
MC Mixed 17
43% 15.1 GB/s
SC Read 11
SC Write 11
SC Mixed 11.3
32% 11.1 GB/s
Latency 79.7
50% 79.7 ns
Poor: 38%
This bench: 43.1%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 8 6 60 24" 1280 720 PHL08B0 Philips 241SL
Typical Z800 Workstation Builds (Compare 1,952 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

System: HP Z800 Workstation

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback