HP Compaq 8200 Elite SFF PC

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 71%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics0.56% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive24.1% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (30%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP Compaq 8200 Elite SFF PC  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 1495
Memory1.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20111110
Uptime15.1 Days
Run DateSep 16 '21 at 00:53
Run Duration249 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 30%

 PC Performing below expectations (40th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2500
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
71% Very good
Memory 83.8
1-Core 90.7
2-Core 183
69% 119 Pts
4-Core 336
8-Core 344
45% 340 Pts
64-Core 281
17% 281 Pts
Poor: 47%
This bench: 71%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)
HP(103C 1495) 2GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4459
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
0.56% Terrible
Lighting 0.5
Reflection 1.4
Parallax 0.5
0% 0.8 fps
MRender 1.5
Gravity 0.4
Splatting 1.2
1% 1.03 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 0.56%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 120GB-$28
17GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFK71E0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 55 2.8 25 56 0.7 8.9 MB/s
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
24.1% Poor
Read 209
Write 98.1
Mixed 80.8
SusWrite 24.7
23% 103 MB/s
4K Read 14.8
4K Write 19
4K Mixed 9.9
45% 14.6 MB/s
DQ Read 12.2
DQ Write 19.9
DQ Mixed 12.9
11% 15 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 24.1%
Great: 85%
TOSHIBA TransMemory 16GB
13GB free, PID 6544
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.6 4.6 4.1 4.3 4.1 4.6 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
6.25% Terrible
Read 29.5
Write 4.5
Mixed 7.7
SusWrite 4.7
12% 11.6 MB/s
4K Read 4
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0.1
18% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 6.25%
Great: 9%
Generic- Multi-Card 8GB
5GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.4 6.1 6.2 6 6.2 6.2 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
2.76% Terrible
Read 8.4
Write 6
Mixed 4.2
SusWrite 6
8% 6.15 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
4% 0.33 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 2.76%
Great: 10%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5584-016.A00LF 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (32nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
36.4% Below average
MC Read 13.8
MC Write 10.3
MC Mixed 12.8
35% 12.3 GB/s
SC Read 8.3
SC Write 9.2
SC Mixed 11.9
28% 9.8 GB/s
Latency 73.7
54% 73.7 ns
Poor: 26%
This bench: 36.4%
Great: 57%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 9 6 4 60 27" 1920 1080 ACR0523 K272HL
Typical Compaq 8200 Elite SFF PC Builds (Compare 3,268 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: HP Compaq 8200 Elite SFF PC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 58% - Above average Total price: $278
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i3-12100F $95Nvidia RTX 4070 $542Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback