Asus G751JM

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics3.3% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive100% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (67%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAsus G751JM  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK G751JM
Memory23.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140915
Uptime32.8 Days
Run DateSep 15 '21 at 20:08
Run Duration178 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 67%

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4710HQ
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
63.1% Good
Memory 70.8
1-Core 91.3
2-Core 175
64% 112 Pts
4-Core 299
8-Core 468
47% 383 Pts
64-Core 498
31% 498 Pts
Poor: 31%
This bench: 63.1%
Great: 70%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4600 (Mobile 1.15 GHz)
Asus(1043 171D) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.5058
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
3.3% Terrible
Lighting 3.7
Reflection 17.1
Parallax 6.4
3% 9.07 fps
MRender 6.8
Gravity 2.5
Splatting 4.9
4% 4.73 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.3%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 1TB-$110
101GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 399 389 154 98 95 98 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
100% Outstanding
Read 475
Write 196
Mixed 349
SusWrite 206
68% 306 MB/s
4K Read 33.5
4K Write 90.6
4K Mixed 53.1
167% 59.1 MB/s
DQ Read 378
DQ Write 345
DQ Mixed 360
271% 361 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 100%
Great: 133%
Seagate Momentus 2.5" 1TB
795GB free
Firmware: 2BA30001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 82 96 97 96 97 97 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
53.3% Above average
Read 91.6
Write 64.6
Mixed 53.7
SusWrite 94
56% 76 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.9
163% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 53.3%
Great: 59%
Seagate Backup+ SL 2TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: A905
SusWrite @10s intervals: 90 100 100 99 100 100 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
48% Average
Read 69.2
Write 52.1
Mixed 44.1
SusWrite 98
48% 65.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
145% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 48%
Great: 64%
Generic STORAGE DEVICE 125GB
66GB free, PID 0747
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 24 58 84 82 85 85 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
31.8% Below average
Read 87.3
Write 80.4
Mixed 70.2
SusWrite 69.7
103% 76.9 MB/s
4K Read 7.4
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 1.5
102% 3.2 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 31.8%
Great: 43%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown F3-1333C9-8GSA 0215 CMSO8GX3M1A1333C9 0215 CMSO8GX3M1A1333C9 0215 CMSO8GX3M1A1333C9 32GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
44.6% Average
MC Read 15.9
MC Write 16.4
MC Mixed 13.5
44% 15.3 GB/s
SC Read 12.5
SC Write 17.1
SC Mixed 15.8
43% 15.1 GB/s
Latency 99.6
40% 99.6 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 8 6 60 17.3" 1280 720 LGD046C
Typical G751JM Builds (Compare 228 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Asus G751JM

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 37% - Below average Total price: $53
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback