Asus TUF B450M-PLUS GAMING

Performance Results


Gaming 69% Battle cruiser	Desktop 81% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 64% Destroyer


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (73rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 27 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	85.3% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	68.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (30%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asus TUF B450M-PLUS GAMING (all builds)
Memory	5.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20191113
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Sep 15 '21 at 18:23
Run Duration	149 Seconds
Run User	AZE-User
Background CPU	30%

Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 2600-$145 179,588 User benchmarks, average bench 73% AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	80.9% Excellent	Memory 76.6 1-Core 113 2-Core 233 78% 141 Pts	4-Core 458 8-Core 742 74% 600 Pts	64-Core 921 57% 921 Pts
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 80.9% Great: 81%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132 1,459,281 User benchmarks, average bench 80% Gigabyte(1458 3703) CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 471.41 Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)	85.3% Excellent	Lighting 107 Reflection 170 Parallax 114 87% 130 fps	MRender 95.7 Gravity 103 Splatting 99.4 81% 99.2 fps
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 85.3% Great: 88%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston SA400M8240G 240GB 27,523 User benchmarks, average bench 70% 149GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFK61E1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 205 95 44 133 36 139 MB/s Performing below potential (39^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	68.2% Good	Read 234 Write 116 Mixed 243 SusWrite 109 39% 176 MB/s	4K Read 33.9 4K Write 66.1 4K Mixed 36.5 133% 45.5 MB/s	DQ Read 231 DQ Write 274 DQ Mixed 190 161% 232 MB/s
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 68.2% Great: 91%
WD WD5000AVCS-6 500GB 9,720 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 244GB free Firmware: 01.00A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 82 82 82 83 83 83 MB/s Performing above expectations (78^th percentile)	46.5% Average	Read 79.5 Write 77.8 Mixed 47.3 SusWrite 82.5 53% 71.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1.1 4K Mixed 0.5 93% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 46.5% Great: 51%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron M378A1K43BB2G3A141 1x8GB 25 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 1 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing above expectations (64^th percentile)	45.7% Average	MC Read 17.1 MC Write 15.7 MC Mixed 14 45% 15.6 GB/s	SC Read 16.9 SC Write 13.4 SC Mixed 14.2 42% 14.8 GB/s	Latency 87.1 46% 87.1 ns
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 45.7% Great: 53%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	6	2	120	27"	1280 720	GMX0027 GMX27C144

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF B450M-PLUS GAMING Builds (Compare 4,054 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 78%

Battleship

Desktop 87%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 73%

Battleship

Motherboard: Asus TUF B450M-PLUS GAMING

CPU
Ryzen 5 3600AMD $90Bench 83%, 1,072,639 samples	845x
Ryzen 5 2600AMD $145Bench 73%, 179,588 samples	629x
Ryzen 7 2700XAMD $199Bench 76%, 159,077 samples	293x

GPU
RTX 2060Nvidia $290Bench 90%, 645,160 samples	299x
GTX 1660S (Super)Nvidia $240Bench 71%, 428,800 samples	237x
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	227x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	102x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $76Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	92x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	76x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $39Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	181x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $60Bench 85%, 346,786 samples	134x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $48Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	129x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 87% - Excellent

Total price: $447

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $171	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i3-12100F $80	Nvidia RTX 4070 $500	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16