Acer ConceptD CM100-51A

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 33%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 32%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (91st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 9 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 100%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics24.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive301% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemAcer ConceptD CM100-51A  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer ConceptD CM100-51A
Memory11.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kolorów
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200306
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 15 '21 at 15:35
Run Duration136 Seconds
Run User POL-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-9700-$243
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 4.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
100% Outstanding
Memory 91.9
1-Core 148
2-Core 295
98% 178 Pts
4-Core 584
8-Core 1,056
98% 820 Pts
64-Core 1,024
63% 1,024 Pts
Poor: 74%
This bench: 100%
Great: 99%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro P1000
Nvidia(10DE 11BC) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1544 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 430.86
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
24.2% Poor
Lighting 30.7
Reflection 30.5
Parallax 28.2
25% 29.8 fps
MRender 27
Gravity 30.5
Splatting 26.2
23% 27.9 fps
Poor: 23%
This bench: 24.2%
Great: 25%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC PC SN730 SDBQNTY-1T00-1014 1TB
911GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 11101100
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1590 1746 1749 1766 1761 1727 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
301% Outstanding
Read 1,978
Write 2,252
Mixed 1,987
SusWrite 1,723
448% 1985 MB/s
4K Read 43.8
4K Write 128
4K Mixed 64.2
216% 78.5 MB/s
DQ Read 1,339
DQ Write 874
DQ Mixed 1,064
805% 1,092 MB/s
Poor: 153%
This bench: 301%
Great: 299%
Toshiba DT01ACA200 2TB-$60
2TB free
Firmware: MX4OABS0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 196 197 197 197 197 197 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
112% Outstanding
Read 195
Write 187
Mixed 22.1
SusWrite 197
108% 150 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.6
153% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 112%
Great: 108%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378A1K43DB2-CTD 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
88.1% Excellent
MC Read 33.9
MC Write 35.2
MC Mixed 24.4
89% 31.2 GB/s
SC Read 19.5
SC Write 36.3
SC Mixed 27.3
79% 27.7 GB/s
Latency 64.2
62% 64.2 ns
Poor: 61%
This bench: 88.1%
Great: 89%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 9 7 60 21.5" 1280 720 HPN342E HP 22w
Typical ConceptD CM100-51A Builds (Compare 9 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 30%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 95%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

System: Acer ConceptD CM100-51A

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 95% - Outstanding Total price: $243
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback