Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 74% Battleship	Desktop 80% Battleship	Workstation 70% Battleship


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	94.3% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) (all builds)
Memory	12.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20200617
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Sep 15 '21 at 14:10
Run Duration	173 Seconds
Run User	TUR-User
Background CPU	0%

Watch Gameplay How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 3600-$83 1,072,639 User benchmarks, average bench 83% AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)	79.9% Very good	Memory 66.5 1-Core 133 2-Core 266 82% 155 Pts	4-Core 500 8-Core 792 80% 646 Pts	64-Core 998 62% 998 Pts
Poor: 73% ↑ This bench: 79.9% Great: 92%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 5700-XT-$199 254,908 User benchmarks, average bench 98% Asus(1043 0577) Ram: 8GB, Driver: 21.9.1 Performing below potential (20^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	94.3% Outstanding	Lighting 118 Reflection 140 Parallax 181 96% 146 fps	MRender 114 Gravity 126 Splatting 97.1 90% 112 fps
Poor: 91% ↑ This bench: 94.3% Great: 104%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
TOSHIBA-RC500 500GB 4,418 User benchmarks, average bench 172% 61GB free (System drive) Firmware: ECFA12.5 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 309 Write 1,293 Mixed 215 138% 606 MB/s	4K Read 34.6 4K Write 131 4K Mixed 44.6 179% 69.9 MB/s	DQ Read 927 DQ Write 903 DQ Mixed 1026 740% 952 MB/s
Poor: 112% Great: 233%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2018)-$45 695,066 User benchmarks, average bench 87% 1.5TB free Firmware: 0001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 171 173 184 184 185 181 MB/s Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)	95.3% Outstanding	Read 153 Write 161 Mixed 75.6 SusWrite 180 104% 142 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 0.6 4K Mixed 0.1 64% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 95.3% Great: 106%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB-$36 287,720 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing below potential (16^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	66.9% Good	MC Read 28.3 MC Write 18.1 MC Mixed 25.6 69% 24 GB/s	SC Read 20.4 SC Write 18.3 SC Mixed 24.7 60% 21.1 GB/s	Latency 110 36% 110 ns
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 66.9% Great: 109%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 70: 7R 8G 11B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
70%	27%	98	328	261	144	23.8"	1920 1080	AOC2402 24G2W1G4

History: Score 48: 7R 2G 7B | Score 70: 7R 8G 11B

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) Builds (Compare 25,866 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 129%

UFO

Desktop 94%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 130%

UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) - $192

CPU
Ryzen 7 3700XAMD $205Bench 86%, 635,419 samples	4,657x
Ryzen 7 5800XAMD $175Bench 98%, 128,080 samples	4,269x
Ryzen 5 5600XAMD $119Bench 96%, 383,420 samples	3,421x

GPU
RTX 3070Nvidia $500Bench 148%, 619,642 samples	2,241x
RTX 3080Nvidia $910Bench 187%, 424,051 samples	2,078x
RTX 2070S (Super)Nvidia $210Bench 115%, 663,603 samples	1,471x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	1,839x
980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $107Bench 394%, 276,089 samples	1,106x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $150Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	867x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $45Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	772x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $55Bench 85%, 346,786 samples	727x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GBCorsair $114Bench 89%, 144,399 samples	646x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 86% - Excellent

Total price: $1,037

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16