To Be Filled By O.E.M.

Performance Results


Gaming 13% Tree trunk	Desktop 68% Battle cruiser	Workstation 11% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	14.7% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	91.1% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago.

Motherboard	To Be Filled By O.E.M. (all builds)
Memory	5.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20200629
Uptime	0.2 Days
Run Date	Sep 15 '21 at 08:58
Run Duration	144 Seconds
Run User	IND-User
Background CPU	18%

PC Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-3570K-$136 185,516 User benchmarks, average bench 68% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	55.5% Above average	Memory 79.9 1-Core 100 2-Core 155 67% 112 Pts	4-Core 179 8-Core 197 25% 188 Pts	64-Core 190 12% 190 Pts
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 55.5% Great: 79%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GT 1030 185,384 User benchmarks, average bench 14% Gigabyte(1458 375C) 2GB CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 471.41 Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	14.7% Very poor	Lighting 18.2 Reflection 23.2 Parallax 18.9 15% 20.1 fps	MRender 16.4 Gravity 19.2 Splatting 17 14% 17.5 fps
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 14.7% Great: 15%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Hs-ssd-e100 256G 256GB 2,993 User benchmarks, average bench 74% 49GB free (System drive) Firmware: SN07985 SusWrite @10s intervals: 354 422 424 418 244 171 MB/s Performing above expectations (79^th percentile)	91.1% Outstanding	Read 464 Write 430 Mixed 410 SusWrite 339 92% 411 MB/s	4K Read 29.9 4K Write 70.8 4K Mixed 37.5 131% 46.1 MB/s	DQ Read 270 DQ Write 236 DQ Mixed 271 198% 259 MB/s
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 91.1% Great: 103%
Toshiba MD03ACA200V 2TB 144 User benchmarks, average bench 74% 2TB free Firmware: FL2V SusWrite @10s intervals: 149 159 160 161 160 162 MB/s Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	90.5% Outstanding	Read 157 Write 156 Mixed 64 SusWrite 158 97% 134 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 3 4K Mixed 1 204% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 90.5% Great: 91%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Transcend JM1333KLN-4G 4GBBNAUCDBA 8GB 1600, 1600 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	47.2% Average	MC Read 18.2 MC Write 19.8 MC Mixed 17.8 53% 18.6 GB/s	SC Read 3.6 SC Write 2.6 SC Mixed 3.8 10% 3.33 GB/s	Latency 80.7 50% 80.7 ns

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	9	7	60	18.5"	1280 720	DELF03B DELL IN1930

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Be Filled By O.E.M. Builds (Compare 5,599 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 58%

Gunboat

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: To Be Filled By O.E.M.

CPU
Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples	718x
Core i5-2400Intel $250Bench 61%, 166,255 samples	281x
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	267x

GPU
HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples	618x
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples	461x
G41 Express ChipsetIntelBench 0%, 33,874 samples	361x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	137x
256GB 256GBSSDBench 77%, 9,229 samples	103x
128GB 128GBSSDBench 65%, 7,332 samples	90x

RAM
2x2GBUnknownBench 20%, 446,702 samples	500x
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	304x
2x4GBUnknownBench 39%, 424,126 samples	227x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 72% - Very good

Total price: $87

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16