Sony VPCCW26FA

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 40%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 44.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics2.01% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
High background CPU (27%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemSony VPCCW26FA  (all builds)
MotherboardSony VAIO
Memory2 GB free of 4 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20091130
Uptime42.1 Days
Run DateSep 15 '21 at 08:40
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User PAK-User
Background CPU 27%

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5 M 520-$70
N/A, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
44.1% Average
Memory 64.4
1-Core 62.1
2-Core 104
47% 76.7 Pts
4-Core 139
8-Core 141
19% 140 Pts
64-Core 151
9% 151 Pts
Poor: 26%
This bench: 44.1%
Great: 47%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 330M
Sony(104D 9072) 512MB
Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 8.16.11.8783
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
2.01% Terrible
Lighting 2.3
Reflection 5
Parallax 1.1
2% 2.8 fps
MRender 4.4
Gravity 1.9
Splatting 2.3
2% 2.87 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.01%
Great: 3%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Momentus 5400.6 2.5" 500GB-$26
373GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0004
SusWrite @10s intervals: 23 29 29 30 21 24 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
10.7% Very poor
Read 11.3
Write 27.8
Mixed 11.3
SusWrite 25.9
14% 19.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.2
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.3
56% 0.43 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 10.7%
Great: 43%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x2GB
2 of 2 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR3
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
23.6% Poor
MC Read 7.2
MC Write 6.9
MC Mixed 10
23% 8.03 GB/s
SC Read 5.7
SC Write 5.5
SC Mixed 6.8
17% 6 GB/s
Latency 115
35% 115 ns
Poor: 10%
This bench: 23.6%
Great: 44%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical VPCCW26FA Builds (Compare 8 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 42%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Sony VPCCW26FA

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 59% - Above average Total price: $70
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $289WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback