| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
| Graphics | 30.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
| Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Very high background CPU (43%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
| System | Micro-Star MS-7B07 |
| Motherboard | MSI A320M PRO-VH PLUS(MS-7B07) (all builds) |
| Memory | 10.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20180316 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Sep 14 '21 at 23:09 |
| Run Duration | 142 Seconds |
| Run User | TUR-User |
| Background CPU | 43% |
PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
61.6%
Good
|
62% 111 Pts
|
44% 327 Pts
|
21% 336 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 471.96
Performing below potential (76th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
30.3%
Below average
|
31% 42.7 fps
|
29% 35.9 fps
| |
| Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$39
590GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 143 148 153 159 156 166 MB/s
|
88.4%
Excellent
|
97% 133 MB/s
|
144% 1 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2400 C16 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 1200 MHz
Performing below potential (29th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
71.2%
Very good
|
74% 26.1 GB/s
|
58% 20.3 GB/s
|
37% 109 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
SkillBench Score 11: 1R 0G 6B (High Scores)
Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware
| Score | Hit Rate | Shots | EFps | 0.1% Low | Refresh Rate | Screen | Resolution | Monitor |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 11% | 11% | 64 | 109 | 5 | 60 | 21.5" | 1920 1080 | CAP952D Casper M2458C |
Typical A320M PRO-VH PLUS(MS-7B07) Builds (Compare 482 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: MSI A320M PRO-VH PLUS(MS-7B07)
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Ryzen 3 2200GAMD $104Bench 60%, 181,631 samples | 78x |
| Ryzen 3 1200AMD $100Bench 57%, 83,528 samples | 73x |
| Ryzen 5 2400GAMD $135Bench 63%, 127,344 samples | 34x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 119x |
| RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples | 36x |
| GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 28x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 70% - Good | Total price: $222 |