Medion H67H2-EM

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 51.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics34.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemMedion H67H2-EM  (all builds)
MotherboardMEDION H67H2-EM
Memory1.2 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20120208
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 14 '21 at 22:11
Run Duration145 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 16%

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2300
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
51.2% Above average
Memory 83.9
1-Core 67.3
2-Core 94.9
54% 82 Pts
4-Core 111
8-Core 115
15% 113 Pts
64-Core 114
7% 114 Pts
Poor: 50%
This bench: 51.2%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 960-$198
Zotac(19DA 2375) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1443 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 431.60
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
34.4% Below average
Lighting 44.3
Reflection 43.4
Parallax 41.4
36% 43 fps
MRender 37.2
Gravity 41.2
Splatting 36.2
31% 38.2 fps
Poor: 30%
This bench: 34.4%
Great: 36%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intenso Sata III 256GB
6GB free (System drive)
Firmware: O122
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
Read 255
Write 222
Mixed 207
51% 228 MB/s
4K Read 22.8
4K Write 53.6
4K Mixed 30.2
102% 35.5 MB/s
DQ Read 172
DQ Write 194
DQ Mixed 145
120% 170 MB/s
Poor: 39% Great: 95%
Hitachi HCS5C1010CLA382 1TB
931GB free
Firmware: JC4O
SusWrite @10s intervals: 87 76 109 116 116 117 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
62.3% Good
Read 114
Write 113
Mixed 57.8
SusWrite 104
71% 97.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.8
140% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 62.3%
Great: 64%
SanDisk Dual Drive 32GB
28GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 14 17 19 19 19 MB/s
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
17.7% Very poor
Read 31.3
Write 18.5
Mixed 20.5
SusWrite 17
28% 21.8 MB/s
4K Read 4.7
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 2.6
198% 3.33 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 17.7%
Great: 38%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Nanya M2F4G64CB8HG5N-CG 1x4GB
1 of 4 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
27.9% Poor
MC Read 8.7
MC Write 9.2
MC Mixed 8.5
25% 8.8 GB/s
SC Read 8.3
SC Write 8.4
SC Mixed 8.6
24% 8.43 GB/s
Latency 73.6
54% 73.6 ns
Poor: 19%
This bench: 27.9%
Great: 30%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H67H2-EM Builds (Compare 46 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard

System: Medion H67H2-EM

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 85% - Excellent Total price: $246
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $23Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback