Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X509DJ_D509DJ

Performance Results


Gaming 15% Tree trunk	Desktop 70% Battleship	Workstation 14% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (78th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 22 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	11.8% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	203% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago.

System	Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X509DJ_D509DJ (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK X509DJ
Memory	6.4 GB free of 12 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OS	Windows 11
BIOS Date	20210329
Uptime	0.2 Days
Run Date	Sep 14 '21 at 18:49
Run Duration	143 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	2%

PC Performing above expectations (78^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 3500U 78,189 User benchmarks, average bench 48% FP5, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 3.05 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	62.3% Good	Memory 69.5 1-Core 104 2-Core 187 68% 120 Pts	4-Core 297 8-Core 515 49% 406 Pts	64-Core 514 32% 514 Pts
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 62.3% Great: 63%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce MX230 6,801 User benchmarks, average bench 10% Asus(1043 14CF) 2GB Ram: 2GB, Driver: 21.20.02 Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	11.8% Very poor	Lighting 14.4 Reflection 16.5 Parallax 12.7 12% 14.5 fps	MRender 16.7 Gravity 13.5 Splatting 14 12% 14.7 fps
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 11.8% Great: 12%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Transcend TS256GMTE220S 256GB 2,678 User benchmarks, average bench 213% 193GB free (System drive) Firmware: 42B4S8JA SusWrite @10s intervals: 375 282 260 272 270 266 MB/s Performing below expectations (40^th percentile)	203% Outstanding	Read 2,480 Write 1,180 Mixed 1,215 SusWrite 287 284% 1,290 MB/s	4K Read 56 4K Write 72.2 4K Mixed 63 204% 63.7 MB/s	DQ Read 743 DQ Write 277 DQ Mixed 409 329% 476 MB/s
Poor: 128% ↑ This bench: 203% Great: 279%
WD WD10SPZX-00HKTT0 1TB 294,991 User benchmarks, average bench 56% 652GB free Firmware: 04.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 98 98 96 98 98 98 MB/s Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile)	68.2% Good	Read 139 Write 86.3 Mixed 64 SusWrite 97.7 71% 96.7 MB/s	4K Read 1.2 4K Write 4.5 4K Mixed 0.3 167% 2 MB/s
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 68.2% Great: 79%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471A5244CB0-CTD Apacer D22.23249E.001 12GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 68% 2667, 2667 MHz 4096, 8192 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	68.1% Good	MC Read 25.8 MC Write 25 MC Mixed 20.5 68% 23.8 GB/s	SC Read 20.4 SC Write 30.4 SC Mixed 22.1 69% 24.3 GB/s	Latency 102 39% 102 ns
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 68.1% Great: 68%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	9	7	60	15.5"	1280 720	CMN15F5

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X509DJ_D509DJ Builds (Compare 60 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 11%

Tree trunk

Desktop 55%

Yacht

Workstation 10%

Tree trunk

System: Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X509DJ_D509DJ

CPU
Ryzen 5 3500UAMDBench 48%, 78,189 samples	36x
Ryzen 7 3700UAMDBench 49%, 23,686 samples	14x
Ryzen 3 3200UAMDBench 41%, 21,522 samples	10x

GPU
Radeon Vega 8 GraphicsAMDBench 10%, 115,953 samples	25x
GeForce MX230NvidiaBench 10%, 6,801 samples	17x
Radeon RX Vega 10 GraphicsAMDBench 10%, 37,264 samples	12x

SSD
PC SN520 SDAPNUW-256G-1202 256GBWDCBench 145%, 4,206 samples	8x
660p NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBIntel $60Bench 156%, 162,275 samples	7x
Micron_2200V_MTFDHBA256TCK 256GBBench 127%, 254 samples	6x

RAM
M471A5244CB0-CTD Hynix HMA851S6JJR6N-VK 8GBSamsungBench 58%, 6,259 samples	28x
M471A5244CB0-CTD 1x4GBSamsungBench 30%, 48,985 samples	8x
4ATF51264HZ-2G3E1 Hynix HMA851S6JJR6N-VK 8GBMicronBench 57%, 2,923 samples	5x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $280	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $168	Nvidia RTX 4070 $490	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16