Asrock H77M

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics1.48% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive34.3% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock H77M  (all builds)
Memory6.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120911
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 12 '17 at 11:13
Run Duration146 Seconds
Run User ZAF-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3570
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
76.8% Very good
Memory 85.5
1-Core 105
2-Core 203
75% 131 Pts
4-Core 394
8-Core 394
53% 394 Pts
64-Core 398
25% 398 Pts
Poor: 50%
This bench: 76.8%
Great: 75%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 210
Nvidia(10DE 0699) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 342.1
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
1.48% Terrible
Lighting 1.7
Reflection 2.85
Parallax 0.72
1% 1.75 fps
MRender 2.95
Gravity 1.2
Splatting 2
2% 2.05 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.48%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Corsair Force LS 120GB-$98
91GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S9FM01.8 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
34.3% Below average
Read 234
Write 76.3
Mixed 151
34% 154 MB/s
4K Read 17.5
4K Write 47.4
4K Mixed 5.17
58% 23.3 MB/s
DQ Read 58.4
DQ Write 122
DQ Mixed 2.19
27% 60.9 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 34.3%
Great: 84%
WD Blue 4TB (2015)-$85
3.5TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
79.3% Very good
Read 134
Write 142
Mixed 144
106% 140 MB/s
4K Read 0.88
4K Write 2.38
4K Mixed 0.29
113% 1.19 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 79.3%
Great: 101%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$25
930GB free
Firmware: CC47 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
84.6% Excellent
Read 157
Write 138
Mixed 136
108% 144 MB/s
4K Read 0.86
4K Write 1.71
4K Mixed 0.37
109% 0.98 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 84.6%
Great: 112%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 78.BAGEJ.9KK0C 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
52.9% Above average
MC Read 18.9
MC Write 18.8
MC Mixed 16.7
52% 18.1 GB/s
SC Read 16
SC Write 17.6
SC Mixed 16
47% 16.5 GB/s
Latency 71.6
56% 71.6 ns
Poor: 49%
This bench: 52.9%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H77M Builds (Compare 371 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asrock H77M - $186

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $571
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback