Asus H87-PLUS

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 46%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 37%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (75th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 25 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics57.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
MotherboardAsus H87-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1440 x 900 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20141015
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateSep 14 '21 at 12:47
Run Duration105 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU8%
Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (75th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4770-$65
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
82.5% Excellent
Memory 88.7
1-Core 110
2-Core 214
79% 138 Pts
4-Core 417
8-Core 563
62% 490 Pts
64-Core 524
32% 524 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 82.5%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130
Gigabyte(1458 22FD) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1400 MHz, MLim: 1900 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 21.5.2
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
57.6% Above average
Lighting 74.7
Reflection 64.7
Parallax 93.1
61% 77.5 fps
MRender 67
Gravity 77.4
Splatting 49.2
51% 64.5 fps
Poor: 46%
This bench: 57.6%
Great: 56%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Momentus 2.5" 1TB
670GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 57 51 50 60 79 82 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
43.9% Average
Read 90
Write 84.8
Mixed 49.5
SusWrite 63
53% 71.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.6
107% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 43.9%
Great: 59%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B5273DH0-CH9 0215 CMV4GX3M1A1333C9 8GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
49.2% Average
MC Read 17.7
MC Write 17.6
MC Mixed 14.8
48% 16.7 GB/s
SC Read 13.3
SC Write 17.1
SC Mixed 14.8
43% 15.1 GB/s
Latency 68.9
58% 68.9 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 49.2%
Great: 53%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H87-PLUS Builds (Compare 853 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus H87-PLUS - $128

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $284
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback