Lenovo 9948A32

Performance Results


Gaming 2% Tree trunk	Desktop 32% Sail boat	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 31.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	2.99% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	32.2% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (83%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago.

System	Lenovo 9948A32 (all builds)
Motherboard	LENOVO LENOVO
Memory	0.8 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20080626
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Sep 14 '21 at 08:25
Run Duration	226 Seconds
Run User	PHL-User
Background CPU	83%

PC Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core2 Duo E8400-$89 68,540 User benchmarks, average bench 40% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	31.4% Below average	Memory 54.3 1-Core 24.1 2-Core 36.2 28% 38.2 Pts	4-Core 49.8 8-Core 64.1 7% 56.9 Pts	64-Core 76.1 5% 76.1 Pts
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 31.4% Great: 47%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 730 164,888 User benchmarks, average bench 5% Nvidia(10DE 0F02) 2GB CLim: 700 MHz, MLim: 267 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 388.13 Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)	2.99% Terrible	Lighting 3.6 Reflection 4.7 Parallax 1.1 3% 3.13 fps	MRender 4.3 Gravity 4.2 Splatting 3.1 3% 3.87 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 2.99% Great: 7%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Hs-ssd-e100 128G 128GB 2,388 User benchmarks, average bench 70% 84GB free (System drive) Firmware: SN08979 SusWrite @10s intervals: 182 201 196 201 197 202 MB/s Performing below potential (2^nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	32.2% Below average	Read 163 Write 127 Mixed 160 SusWrite 196 36% 161 MB/s	4K Read 14.1 4K Write 13.8 4K Mixed 11.1 43% 13 MB/s	DQ Read 15.5 DQ Write 12.7 DQ Mixed 16.7 12% 15 MB/s
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 32.2% Great: 100%
Hitachi HDS721680PLAT80 80GB 37 User benchmarks, average bench 28% 1GB free Firmware: P21OA8BA Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 59.8 Write 54 Mixed 34.5 37% 49.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.8 148% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 9% Great: 40%
WD WD800BB-88JHC0 80GB 2,880 User benchmarks, average bench 20% 15GB free Firmware: 05.01C05 SusWrite @10s intervals: 38 39 39 39 39 39 MB/s Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)	25% Poor	Read 47.9 Write 42.6 Mixed 32.3 SusWrite 38.7 30% 40.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.8 140% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 25% Great: 31%
Samsung HD160JJ 160GB-$85 5,008 User benchmarks, average bench 25% 8GB free Firmware: ZM100-41 SusWrite @10s intervals: 45 46 47 47 44 44 MB/s Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)	25.3% Poor	Read 42.3 Write 47.4 Mixed 34.6 SusWrite 45.5 31% 42.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.3 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.7 114% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 25.3% Great: 33%
Mass Storage Device 120GB 1,006 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 112GB free, PID 6116 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 23 24 24 24 24 24 MB/s Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)	11.6% Very poor	Read 30.5 Write 23.2 Mixed 19.6 SusWrite 23.9 32% 24.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 0.6 4K Mixed 0.5 39% 0.5 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 11.6% Great: 70%
SanDisk Cruzer Blade 8GB 30,139 User benchmarks, average bench 10% 1GB free, PID 5567 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.2 6.4 6.6 6.6 6.7 6.4 MB/s Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)	9.47% Terrible	Read 15.9 Write 5.5 Mixed 9 SusWrite 6.5 11% 9.23 MB/s	4K Read 3.5 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 2 135% 2.37 MB/s
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 9.47% Great: 13%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x2GB 446,702 User benchmarks, average bench 20% 2 of 2 slots used 4GB DIMM DDR2 Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)	15.2% Very poor	MC Read 5.2 MC Write 5.4 MC Mixed 5.1 15% 5.23 GB/s	SC Read 2.6 SC Write 3.1 SC Mixed 3 8% 2.9 GB/s	Latency 145 28% 145 ns
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 15.2% Great: 44%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	9	6	60	26"	1280 720	XXX0000

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical 9948A32 Builds (Compare 5 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 3%

Tree trunk

Desktop 43%

Speed boat

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 9948A32

CPU
Core2 Duo E8400Intel $89Bench 40%, 68,540 samples	4x
Core2 Quad Q8200Intel $49Bench 43%, 19,990 samples	1x

GPU
GeForce GT 730NvidiaBench 5%, 164,888 samples	3x
GeForce GT 710NvidiaBench 3%, 187,161 samples	2x

SSD
128G 128GBHs-ssd-e100Bench 70%, 2,388 samples	3x
256GB SSD 256GBLexarBench 111%, 12,615 samples	2x

RAM
2x2GBUnknownBench 20%, 446,702 samples	5x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 55% - Above average

Total price: $89

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16