HP Compaq Elite 8300 SFF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics1.08% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive59.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemHP Compaq Elite 8300 SFF  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 3397
Memory4.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120507
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateSep 13 '21 at 18:16
Run Duration208 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3470-$59
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
75.5% Very good
Memory 89.1
1-Core 99.1
2-Core 196
74% 128 Pts
4-Core 356
8-Core 377
48% 366 Pts
64-Core 368
23% 368 Pts
Poor: 50%
This bench: 75.5%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 5450
AMD(1002 010A) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
1.08% Terrible
Lighting 1.2
Reflection 1.5
Parallax 1.6
1% 1.43 fps
MRender 1.6
Gravity 0.9
Splatting 2
1% 1.5 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.08%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial M500 120GB-$75
49GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MU03
SusWrite @10s intervals: 126 121 114 111 104 100 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
59.3% Above average
Read 402
Write 134
Mixed 197
SusWrite 112
46% 211 MB/s
4K Read 18.3
4K Write 56.8
4K Mixed 25
90% 33.4 MB/s
DQ Read 256
DQ Write 133
DQ Mixed 148
123% 179 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 59.3%
Great: 77%
Verbatim Desktop HDD 3.0 2TB
1.5TB free, PID 0415
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 25 26 26 26 26 26 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
21% Poor
Read 22.4
Write 22.2
Mixed 23.9
SusWrite 25.7
33% 23.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 3.9
4K Mixed 0.6
156% 1.8 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 21%
Great: 76%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 16JTF51264AZ-1G6M1 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
58.8% Above average
MC Read 23.2
MC Write 22.7
MC Mixed 18.5
61% 21.5 GB/s
SC Read 9.9
SC Write 17.4
SC Mixed 10.8
36% 12.7 GB/s
Latency 68.3
58% 68.3 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 58.8%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 19 11 9 60 21.5" 1920 1080 HWP2948 HP LA2206
Typical Compaq Elite 8300 SFF Builds (Compare 5,438 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: HP Compaq Elite 8300 SFF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $87
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback