Asrock H97M Pro4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 51%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 40%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (85th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 15 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics59.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive63.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)
MotherboardAsrock H97M Pro4  (all builds)
Memory12.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150727
Uptime0.6 Days
Run DateSep 13 '21 at 17:54
Run Duration171 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-3GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (85th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4590-$188
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
80% Excellent
Memory 88.3
1-Core 80
2-Core 212
72% 127 Pts
4-Core 415
8-Core 414
56% 415 Pts
64-Core 406
25% 406 Pts
Poor: 45%
This bench: 80%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119
EVGA(3842 6367) 3GB
CLim: 2126 MHz, MLim: 2087 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 471.96
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
59.4% Above average
Lighting 73.7
Reflection 101
Parallax 60.8
60% 78.5 fps
MRender 71.1
Gravity 74.6
Splatting 68.3
58% 71.3 fps
Poor: 48%
This bench: 59.4%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
PNY CS900 120GB-$25
44GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CS900613
SusWrite @10s intervals: 149 251 115 45 65 44 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
63.5% Good
Read 313
Write 222
Mixed 238
SusWrite 111
49% 221 MB/s
4K Read 24.7
4K Write 79.7
4K Mixed 27.1
114% 43.8 MB/s
DQ Read 167
DQ Write 262
DQ Mixed 159
136% 196 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 63.5%
Great: 87%
Hitachi HDS722020ALA330 2TB-$71
1.5TB free
Firmware: JKAOA20N
SusWrite @10s intervals: 101 112 111 113 113 114 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
62.1% Good
Read 106
Write 102
Mixed 60.2
SusWrite 111
69% 94.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.7
135% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 62.1%
Great: 69%
Kingston DataTraveler 2.0 1GB
1GB free, PID 1607
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.1 4.1 4.1 4.3 4.2 4.2 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
5.62% Terrible
Read 20.4
Write 4
Mixed 5.2
SusWrite 4.1
9% 8.42 MB/s
4K Read 7.5
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
28% 2.5 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.62%
Great: 6%
Generic STORAGE DEVICE 4GB
3GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 12 13 13 13 12 13 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
10.6% Very poor
Read 18.2
Write 9
Mixed 6.2
SusWrite 12.4
14% 11.5 MB/s
4K Read 5.4
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.6
85% 2.43 MB/s
Poor: 2%
This bench: 10.6%
Great: 11%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL RipjawsX DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
61.5% Good
MC Read 21.7
MC Write 23
MC Mixed 19.4
61% 21.4 GB/s
SC Read 16.9
SC Write 19.8
SC Mixed 19.9
54% 18.9 GB/s
Latency 69.2
58% 69.2 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 61.5%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 9 7 60 21.5" 1280 720 VSC0523 VA2223wm
Typical H97M Pro4 Builds (Compare 1,137 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 26%
Raft

Motherboard: Asrock H97M Pro4 - $200

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 58% - Above average Total price: $669
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $79G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback