Microsoft Surface Pro 7

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 46%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics5.59% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive136% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemMicrosoft Surface Pro 7  (all builds)
MotherboardMicrosoft Surface Pro 7
Memory1.2 GB free of 4 GB @ 4.3 GHz
Display2736 x 1824 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210430
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateSep 13 '21 at 12:28
Run Duration132 Seconds
Run User ARE-User
Background CPU 18%

 PC Performing above expectations (71st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-1005G1
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.2 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
46% Average
Memory 47.7
1-Core 77.7
2-Core 158
51% 94.3 Pts
4-Core 255
8-Core 257
34% 256 Pts
64-Core 256
16% 256 Pts
Poor: 19%
This bench: 46%
Great: 57%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD G1
Microsoft(1414 0037) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8681
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
5.59% Terrible
Lighting 6.4
Reflection 4.5
Parallax 7.1
5% 6 fps
MRender 7.3
Gravity 6.9
Splatting 8.6
6% 7.6 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.59%
Great: 7%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kbg40zpz128g TOSHIBA MEMORY 128GB
94GB free (System drive)
Firmware: AEMS0102
SusWrite @10s intervals: 368 506 481 407 211 211 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
136% Outstanding
Read 736
Write 696
Mixed 495
SusWrite 364
128% 573 MB/s
4K Read 49.2
4K Write 107
4K Mixed 61.8
210% 72.6 MB/s
DQ Read 579
DQ Write 266
DQ Mixed 433
318% 426 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 136%
Great: 151%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung K4U6E3S4AA-MGCL 2x2GB
2 of 2 slots used
4GB Row of chips LPDDR4 4267 MHz clocked @ 3733 MHz
Performing below potential (65th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
59.1% Above average
MC Read 23.8
MC Write 22.7
MC Mixed 18.8
62% 21.8 GB/s
SC Read 12.5
SC Write 20.7
SC Mixed 18.9
50% 17.4 GB/s
Latency 169
24% 169 ns
Poor: 39%
This bench: 59.1%
Great: 63%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 9 7 60 12.3" 1280 720 LGD0555
Typical Surface Pro 7 Builds (Compare 1,950 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk

System: Microsoft Surface Pro 7

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing charade so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit a lot from flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they've no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products, which UserBenchmark reveals.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. The 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data which saves our users millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback