Asus P8P67 PRO

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 20%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics20.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus P8P67 PRO  (all builds)
Memory3.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit barev
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120217
Uptime4 Days
Run DateSep 13 '21 at 10:56
Run Duration178 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2500K-$246
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 4.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
86.9% Excellent
Memory 96.3
1-Core 116
2-Core 233
85% 149 Pts
4-Core 448
8-Core 454
60% 451 Pts
64-Core 453
28% 453 Pts
Poor: 44%
This bench: 86.9%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 660-$170
Asus(1043 843B) 2GB
CLim: 1241 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 461.09
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
20.6% Poor
Lighting 23.3
Reflection 27.3
Parallax 32.3
19% 27.6 fps
MRender 33.6
Gravity 30
Splatting 25.4
24% 29.7 fps
Poor: 18%
This bench: 20.6%
Great: 21%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
13GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 472
Write 452
Mixed 376
97% 434 MB/s
4K Read 32.9
4K Write 96.5
4K Mixed 44.5
158% 58 MB/s
DQ Read 387
DQ Write 354
DQ Mixed 347
267% 363 MB/s
Poor: 72% Great: 124%
WD Red 3TB (2012)-$100
927GB free
Firmware: 82.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 62 77 76 76 77 78 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
53.3% Above average
Read 111
Write 98.2
Mixed 55
SusWrite 74.4
62% 84.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 0.9
184% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 53.3%
Great: 88%
WD Blue 320GB (2008)-$39
39GB free
Firmware: 12.01B02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 64 66 64 65 66 68 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
32.6% Below average
Read 47.8
Write 48.5
Mixed 39
SusWrite 65.4
37% 50.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.8
155% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 32.6%
Great: 60%
WD Red 3TB (2012)-$100
792GB free
Firmware: 82.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 70 78 78 77 76 76 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
48.3% Average
Read 92.1
Write 87.9
Mixed 59.5
SusWrite 75.7
58% 78.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 1
188% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 48.3%
Great: 88%
SDXC Card 64GB
1GB free, PID null
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 78.7
Write 54.6
Mixed 57.4
77% 63.6 MB/s
4K Read 5.4
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 2.9
207% 3.63 MB/s
Poor: 7% Great: 41%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Dominator DHX DDR3 1600 C7 4x2GB
4 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
61.2% Good
MC Read 20.7
MC Write 22
MC Mixed 19.1
59% 20.6 GB/s
SC Read 17.3
SC Write 20.7
SC Mixed 19.2
54% 19.1 GB/s
Latency 52.9
76% 52.9 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 61.2%
Great: 66%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 9 7 60 24.1" 1280 720 ENC2644 CS240
Typical P8P67 PRO Builds (Compare 1,046 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 38%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Asus P8P67 PRO - $230

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 56% - Above average Total price: $849
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. Additionally, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback