Today's hottest deals

Asus M5A97

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 30%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 31.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics0.93% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 3 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (49%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus M5A97  (all builds)
Memory1.6 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20110822
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateSep 13 '21 at 00:24
Run Duration125 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU 49%

 PC Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon II X2 250 (2013 D.Ri)
AM3r2, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3 GHz
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
31.6% Below average
Memory 54.5
1-Core 37.9
2-Core 56.5
33% 49.6 Pts
4-Core 51.8
8-Core 60.2
7% 56 Pts
64-Core 73.3
4% 73.3 Pts
Poor: 27%
This bench: 31.6%
Great: 48%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
ATI Radeon HD 4450
Sapphire(174B 4450) 512MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 8.970.100.3000
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
0.93% Terrible
Lighting 1.1
Reflection 2.5
Parallax 1.5
1% 1.7 fps
MRender 1.4
Gravity 0.7
Splatting 1.5
1% 1.2 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 0.93%
Great: 1%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Green 500GB (2009)-$99
228GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.00A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 37 38 44 48 61 59 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
36.8% Below average
Read 80.3
Write 84.3
Mixed 48.7
SusWrite 47.8
48% 65.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.7
115% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 36.8%
Great: 54%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1x4GB
1 of 4 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz clocked @ 667 MHz
Performing below potential (29th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
19% Very poor
MC Read 7.4
MC Write 5.9
MC Mixed 6.8
19% 6.7 GB/s
SC Read 4.5
SC Write 3.3
SC Mixed 3.9
11% 3.9 GB/s
Latency 145
28% 145 ns
Poor: 13%
This bench: 19%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M5A97 Builds (Compare 320 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 32%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 26%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus M5A97 - $54

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 57% - Above average Total price: $419
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $85
Intel Core i5-13600K $200Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback