Zoostorm 7200-5300B

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 43%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 34%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics55.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemZoostorm 7200-5300B  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK H170-PRO
Memory13.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160506
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 12 '21 at 18:53
Run Duration129 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU6%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (67th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-6400-$79
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
75.2% Very good
Memory 82.3
1-Core 106
2-Core 209
75% 133 Pts
4-Core 395
8-Core 388
52% 391 Pts
64-Core 395
24% 395 Pts
Poor: 39%
This bench: 75.2%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
Nvidia(10DE 11D7) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1923 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 471.68
Performing below potential (59th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
55.7% Above average
Lighting 68.8
Reflection 75.2
Parallax 68.8
56% 70.9 fps
MRender 66.6
Gravity 69.5
Splatting 66
55% 67.4 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 55.7%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZ7LF128HCHP-00000 128GB
80GB free (System drive)
Firmware: Z2333000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 117 161 172 165 174 176 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - drive id incomplete or inconclusive
Read 442
Write 166
Mixed 169
SusWrite 161
52% 234 MB/s
4K Read 22.7
4K Write 83.8
4K Mixed 10.6
92% 39 MB/s
DQ Read 169
DQ Write 174
DQ Mixed 77.6
84% 140 MB/s
Poor: 35% Great: 61%
WD Blue 2TB (2015)-$84
2TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 134 143 72 104 92 0.9 MB/s
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
73.4% Very good
Read 165
Write 147
Mixed 85.9
SusWrite 90.9
90% 122 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1
197% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 73.4%
Great: 84%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KHX2400C15D4/8G KHX2400C15/8G 16GB
2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (37th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
70% Very good
MC Read 25.6
MC Write 27.8
MC Mixed 21.3
71% 24.9 GB/s
SC Read 14.9
SC Write 27.6
SC Mixed 20.3
60% 20.9 GB/s
Latency 76.4
52% 76.4 ns
Poor: 43%
This bench: 70%
Great: 88%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 7200-5300B Builds (Compare 9 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 41%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 32%
Sail boat

System: Zoostorm 7200-5300B

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 95% - Outstanding Total price: $265
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $289WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback