Asus ROG RAMPAGE VI EXTREME OMEGA

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 32%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 106%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 38%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (82nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 18 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 103%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics20.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive356% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus ROG RAMPAGE VI EXTREME OMEGA  (all builds)
Memory57.9 GB free of 64 GB @ 3.8 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201106
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 12 '21 at 16:28
Run Duration202 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-10980XE-$1,100
LGA 2066 R4, 1 CPU, 18 cores, 36 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
103% Outstanding
Memory 94.6
1-Core 152
2-Core 304
100% 184 Pts
4-Core 600
8-Core 1,165
105% 882 Pts
64-Core 3,618
224% 3,618 Pts
Poor: 74%
This bench: 103%
Great: 96%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3090-$1,198
CLim: 2220 MHz, MLim: 5304 MHz, Ram: 24GB, Driver: 471.96
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
20.4% Poor
Lighting 25
Reflection 25
Parallax 25
20% 25 fps
MRender 25
Gravity 25
Splatting 25
20% 25 fps
Poor: 185%
This bench: 20.4%
Great: 230%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$320
250GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2129 1919 1958 1951 1785 1738 MB/s
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
356% Outstanding
Read 2,390
Write 1,969
Mixed 1,380
SusWrite 1,913
429% 1,913 MB/s
4K Read 52.4
4K Write 222
4K Mixed 87.1
308% 120 MB/s
DQ Read 1,278
DQ Write 887
DQ Mixed 1,027
782% 1,064 MB/s
Poor: 215%
This bench: 356%
Great: 425%
Samsung 970 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$320
353GB free
Firmware: 1B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1987 1994 2002 1998 1986 1994 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
363% Outstanding
Read 2,384
Write 1,962
Mixed 1,333
SusWrite 1,993
430% 1,918 MB/s
4K Read 52.4
4K Write 224
4K Mixed 85.6
308% 121 MB/s
DQ Read 1,368
DQ Write 941
DQ Mixed 1107
839% 1,139 MB/s
Poor: 215%
This bench: 363%
Great: 425%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 4000 C19 4x16GB
4 of 8 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3800 MHz
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
188% Outstanding
MC Read 62.9
MC Write 103
MC Mixed 65.4
220% 77 GB/s
SC Read 12.5
SC Write 28.4
SC Mixed 16.6
55% 19.2 GB/s
Latency 58.1
69% 58.1 ns
Poor: 63%
This bench: 188%
Great: 188%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 12 10 60 27" 1280 720 VSC7F34 VP2785 SERIES
Typical ROG RAMPAGE VI EXTREME OMEGA Builds (Compare 363 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 164%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus ROG RAMPAGE VI EXTREME OMEGA

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $1,858
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make lots of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't care about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback