Lenovo 10AAS0KN00

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics1.9% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive76.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemLenovo 10AAS0KN00  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO SHARKBAY
Memory11.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20161121
Uptime2.5 Days
Run DateSep 12 '21 at 11:51
Run Duration150 Seconds
Run User ISR-User
Background CPU 11%

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E3-1275L v3
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
67.1% Good
Memory 79.3
1-Core 91
2-Core 174
67% 115 Pts
4-Core 296
8-Core 448
46% 372 Pts
64-Core 469
29% 469 Pts
Poor: 63%
This bench: 67.1%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics
Legend(17AA 30A3) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.5126
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
1.9% Terrible
Lighting 2
Reflection 2
Parallax 3.6
2% 2.53 fps
MRender 5.4
Gravity 1.2
Splatting 2.6
2% 3.07 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 1.9%
Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SanDisk X100 128GB
69GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 10.06.06
SusWrite @10s intervals: 309 289 309 312 309 311 MB/s
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
76.6% Very good
Read 420
Write 280
Mixed 152
SusWrite 306
65% 290 MB/s
4K Read 20.6
4K Write 61.7
4K Mixed 26.6
98% 36.3 MB/s
DQ Read 305
DQ Write 186
DQ Mixed 135
130% 209 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 76.6%
Great: 91%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston M471B1G73BH0-YK0 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
55.5% Above average
MC Read 21.3
MC Write 20.5
MC Mixed 16.6
56% 19.5 GB/s
SC Read 14.8
SC Write 18.3
SC Mixed 17.2
48% 16.8 GB/s
Latency 81.8
49% 81.8 ns
Poor: 45%
This bench: 55.5%
Great: 58%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 9 7 60 23.8" 1280 720 AOC2473 2473W1M
Typical 10AAS0KN00 Builds (Compare 1 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 10AAS0KN00

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback